-
Hello!
Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.
Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.
How could............
- Thread starter dartguy
- Start date
kenalotia
New member
Er, you really shouldn't be able to get a plain amel hatchling from breeding two snows. All hatchlings should be snows in this case. There is always the possibility, however slim, that the female retained some sperm from an earlier breeding with a non-snow male. Snakes can retain sperm for quite a long time in some cases, and it looks like that must be what happened here. Either that, or the neighbor lied. Breeding a snow with an amel het for snow could produce the hatchlings pictured.
Darin Chappell
Very Senior Hillbilly
What if one of the snakes was actually a less than patternless blizzard (thereby mistaken for a snow), het for anery A? In this instance, half of the clutch would be snows het for anery B, and half would be amels het for anery A and anery B. If this were the case, you could get two "snows" to breed and get snows and amels in the clutch.
Your friend may not know exactly what he/she has there. Other than that possibility, I can't think of anything right away.
???
Your friend may not know exactly what he/she has there. Other than that possibility, I can't think of anything right away.
???
