Buzzard
two corny
I wrote my Congress person about HR 669, This is the responce.
Dear Mr. Burchill,
Thank you for contacting me with your views on the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act. I appreciate your comments and I welcome this opportunity to share my thoughts.
Nonnative species introduced into our nation's ecosystem may pose threats to our environment, agriculture, economy, human health, and survival of native wildlife. The results of importing nonnative species are widespread. Foremost amongst these risks are the spread of disease and the loss of habitat which can contribute to the extinction of indigenous species. Additionally, nonnative species can have a profound negative economic impact through the destruction of structures, crops, and livestock. We must protect our environment, wildlife, and economy from this damage by strengthening restrictions on the introduction of foreign species into the United States.
In an effort to address this issue, Representative Madeleine Bordallo introduced the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act, H.R. 669, on January 26, 2009. This legislation would implement a screening process to assess the risks of importing nonnative wildlife species into the United States. A strict screening process would prevent the introduction of species that threaten the welfare of our nation's ecosystems.
While I believe this bill has many merits, some individuals have expressed concerns that this legislation may negatively impact pet owners and those in the animal sales industry. Please be assured that the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act would not affect current pet ownership or the trade of domesticated animals. It also gives permissions to accredited zoos, aquariums, and educational institutions to hold animals that are not approved for import. The purpose of H.R. 669 is to establish a screening process that, with public input, would prevent harmful species from entering the country, protecting our nations resources and public health.
Shortly after its introduction, H.R. 669 was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources where it awaits further action. If H.R. 669 comes to the House floor for a vote, please be assured that I will keep your views in mind.
Again, thank you for contacting me. I appreciate your thoughts and value your input. Please do not hesitate to contact me or my office regarding this or any other matter that is important to you. If you would like to learn more about my positions on the issues or receive regular updates on what we are working on in Congress, please visit my website at www.bright.house.gov and sign up for my e-Newsletter.
Sincerely,
Bobby Bright
Member of Congress
BUT AT LEAST HE RESPONDED
:twoguns: I wrote back a nice rebutal letter. It had My thoughts on what should be done and used Florida as example with microchipping and permits. It talked about money that would or could be earned for the State. It also addressed the issue of our state and how most exotic species of reptiles could not survive the winters here. It was tackful, yet to the point.
Dear Mr. Burchill,
Thank you for contacting me with your views on the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act. I appreciate your comments and I welcome this opportunity to share my thoughts.
Nonnative species introduced into our nation's ecosystem may pose threats to our environment, agriculture, economy, human health, and survival of native wildlife. The results of importing nonnative species are widespread. Foremost amongst these risks are the spread of disease and the loss of habitat which can contribute to the extinction of indigenous species. Additionally, nonnative species can have a profound negative economic impact through the destruction of structures, crops, and livestock. We must protect our environment, wildlife, and economy from this damage by strengthening restrictions on the introduction of foreign species into the United States.
In an effort to address this issue, Representative Madeleine Bordallo introduced the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act, H.R. 669, on January 26, 2009. This legislation would implement a screening process to assess the risks of importing nonnative wildlife species into the United States. A strict screening process would prevent the introduction of species that threaten the welfare of our nation's ecosystems.
While I believe this bill has many merits, some individuals have expressed concerns that this legislation may negatively impact pet owners and those in the animal sales industry. Please be assured that the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act would not affect current pet ownership or the trade of domesticated animals. It also gives permissions to accredited zoos, aquariums, and educational institutions to hold animals that are not approved for import. The purpose of H.R. 669 is to establish a screening process that, with public input, would prevent harmful species from entering the country, protecting our nations resources and public health.
Shortly after its introduction, H.R. 669 was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources where it awaits further action. If H.R. 669 comes to the House floor for a vote, please be assured that I will keep your views in mind.
Again, thank you for contacting me. I appreciate your thoughts and value your input. Please do not hesitate to contact me or my office regarding this or any other matter that is important to you. If you would like to learn more about my positions on the issues or receive regular updates on what we are working on in Congress, please visit my website at www.bright.house.gov and sign up for my e-Newsletter.
Sincerely,
Bobby Bright
Member of Congress
BUT AT LEAST HE RESPONDED
:twoguns: I wrote back a nice rebutal letter. It had My thoughts on what should be done and used Florida as example with microchipping and permits. It talked about money that would or could be earned for the State. It also addressed the issue of our state and how most exotic species of reptiles could not survive the winters here. It was tackful, yet to the point.
