Roy Munson
New member
Well, without a hint of faux-humility I'll say that I'm shocked. :eek1:Joejr14 said:I'm not at all shocked at who has the most votes so far though....
-
Hello!
Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.
Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.
VOTE for your choice of moderators on this site!
- Thread starter Rich Z
- Start date
Tula_Montage
It's Jager time!
The four leaders at the moment are my idea choice anyway... :shrugs:
Russell
New member
I vote for Tula
I feel the only person for the job of Moderator is someone who's always around and has lots of good things to say about people. And she always seems to be able to respond to most anyone's post. And I think that's a great way to make newbies feel welcome and the rest of the group that's been around feel like their posts are noticed. So that's why I voted for Tula.
Just look at the number of posts she's done in the short time she's been a part of this forum. She puts a LOT of effort into this forum and is very much available to keep an eye on things. I don't think you could have a better moderator.
I feel the only person for the job of Moderator is someone who's always around and has lots of good things to say about people. And she always seems to be able to respond to most anyone's post. And I think that's a great way to make newbies feel welcome and the rest of the group that's been around feel like their posts are noticed. So that's why I voted for Tula.
Just look at the number of posts she's done in the short time she's been a part of this forum. She puts a LOT of effort into this forum and is very much available to keep an eye on things. I don't think you could have a better moderator.
Lexcorn
Dreamcatcher
I have placed my vote...........as, already pointed out, one cannot competently argue over who Moderates, unless a vote has been cast.
Sorry Russell, I do not agree, & this is not a reflexion on Tula, I would suggest that the number of posts is not, necessarily, indicative of appropriate advice.
There are many New people who 'rack up' their posts by simple insertion of "Nice photo there mate" or "Gee that's cool"...........which is of no value to the relevant thread.
Sorry Russell, I do not agree, & this is not a reflexion on Tula, I would suggest that the number of posts is not, necessarily, indicative of appropriate advice.
There are many New people who 'rack up' their posts by simple insertion of "Nice photo there mate" or "Gee that's cool"...........which is of no value to the relevant thread.
Susan
Go Ahead, Make My Day!
I must have had a temporary glitch in my computer then as it didn't bring me here. It does now!Rich Z said:All anyone has to do is to simply CLICK on those moved links in those other forums and it will immediately bring them HERE.......
Roy Munson
New member
I agree that post count is irrelevant to the question of mod capability. However, I do not agree that simple "nice snake" replies are of no value in photo threads. Those replies promote members' passion in the hobby, and encourage them to post more photos. I think the photo forum here is a great resource, so I can't discount these kinds of replies. :shrugs:Lexcorn said:
Russell
New member
Roy Munson said:
Well said Dean, when I finally came back to this thread to check something out, the first reply of, uh no I don't think so Russell, and saw they also said it had no value. My fingers were ready to fly. But I see you beat me to it LONG ago! So no need for me to make the same reply! I totally agree with your reply.
*you must spread some reputation around before giving to Roy Munson again*
well that just stinks...oh well...LOL!
Lexcorn
Dreamcatcher
I, completely, agree with what you're saying here Roy. I, particularly, appreciate the response to Photo insertions.
There is a subtle difference between the genuine praise / comments which are listed, appropriately & very welcome, in the Photo Gallery..... &....... those interjections which are banal & are only executed to add to a persons' post count.
The post count is, as you know, the main context of the reply as it is mis-leading to view the "Count" (alongside some individual's Avatars') as Wisdom.
Please Note that I have 'covered my back' by inserting (some individuals)!
Russell
New member
Come on, Rich stated it earlier, no matter how many votes anyone gets, he's still going to make the ultimate decisions here. He's not going to let anyone he's not comfortable with be a moderator. So let's think about that too for a second and not worry who gets votes. This is just giving him a good idea what the general concensus is. And yeah, I have too much time on my hands...
:crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02:
:crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02: :crazy02:
Russell said:
How do you figure that? I don't recall stating something like that at all. So please, by ALL means show me where I did.
If someone were to be nominated or volunteer to be moderator and I would have felt they were COMPLETELY unacceptable, then they just would not be on this list. As indicated in this thread, YOU are voting for who YOU want to be moderator(s) here. This is in YOUR hands.
