I guess everyone's opinion will differ on the term "Okeetee", but my rule of thumb used to be that not only should the animal look like an "Okeetee" (and even that could be hotly debated, as corns from that area are widely variable in appearances), but there should also be a direct link with at least one ancestor that is known to be of actual "Okeetee" blood line.
So that would rule out any animal with an unknown ancestral history.
Of course, that was back then, and this is now. My belief is that most people today apply the label based strictly upon appearance, and the actual geographical source doesn't matter at all to them.
|