Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.
Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.
Corn Snake Photo GalleryShow them off! Post photos of your prizes and your favorities for everyone else to see and comment on.
Really... I think you have a nice looking Amel there. By the description stated above this would be considered a "Sunglow" according to their "guidelines"
He's not, he's just a good looking Amel, much like you have there. Congrats
Thankyou silentLore, that perfectly illustrates what I mean by the intensity of the orange background colour being a factor AS WELL AS the little or no white factor.
id like you to all go here before you reply again, check out all the different HATCHLING sunglows here, mine looks identical to one, and tht one has MORE white
I agree with Princess, the site looked good but the information wasn't perfectly, exactly right. I also agree with everyone else in saying your snake is an amel. A very nice one, but still only an amel.
Here's Dinka my amel;
And here's Mahina my Sunglow mot;
Notice how on Mahina that even though the picture is a little too bright none of her looks white? Well, except for her belly, but ya know..
I thought it was clear why i posted that picture..for you to compare nightmares snake and my snake..my snake has lots of white and is an amel..nightmares has very little white so qualifys to be a sunglow.....why do you all insist it isnt a sunglow anyway.?it clearly states in the book,that it is a sunglow.thats good enough for me..if you think you are better at identyfying snakes ,then maybe you should publish a book..sorry guys but all i can see is that most on here have an attitude and this is the first post i have read. dare i read more?
Join
now to reply to this thread or open new ones
for your questions & comments! Cornsnakes.com
is the largest online community dedicated to cornsnakes . Registration is open to everyone and FREE.
Click Here to Register!