Heh, yeah, it can get confusing. Part of the problem is that many people have used the name "Ultra" but I've yet to hear anyone who used these names say if they've done any breeding trials to determine if it is or is not compatible with what lines. The whole idea with these breeding loans and trials is to clear up the messes that are out there right now. My predictions are:
1- Ultra Hypo and Trans Hypo will be the same thing.
2- Dream Hypo and Standard Hypo will be the same thing.
We'll see next year, hopefully. If the Trans X Dream cross produces normals (proving them different) then I will be trying "standard" hypo X Dream. The funny thing is that we still won't know if other people using the "Ultra" name are working with one of the three currently known forms, or which one of them, or some other line. (Nor will they know... sucks for them, and the people who buy from them. I guess they will start to see first-hand why it is unwise to just tack a new name on anything without any proof of what it is or isn't.)
Also, Sean at VMS Herps has a weird looking ghost which he bred to a (standard) ghost this year. It produced anerys and ghosts... Apparently it's het for standard hypo and expressing some other form of hypo.
IMO it's going to become more and more valuable to be able to supply someone with info about which line of hypos an individual is from, and to have "standardized" identification (we all use the same names) for these lines, so that people can still rely (as much as possible anyway) on being able to produce hypos from Hypo X Hypo breedings. The goals of this cooperative effort are to try to get some answers.