cornsnakekid92
trouser snake
Yea but then you have retics, white lipped pythons and more..... :sidestep:Drizzt80 said:Burmese have a tendency to just sit there as well. Could be a python thang?!
D80
Yea but then you have retics, white lipped pythons and more..... :sidestep:Drizzt80 said:Burmese have a tendency to just sit there as well. Could be a python thang?!
D80
I've seen this picture on the Pro Exotics website. I believe the photo is theirs (for proper credits).Fenderplayer108 said:What is the background on this picture? ....
.farfrumugen said:i have no problem feeding live to my snakes at times. usually its only in a case of if i run out of f/t but if a snake gets that beat up and does not attack back their was something wrong with the snake imho. nature has a way of taking care of itself. if their was something wrong then nature took its course and removed it. they eat live in the wild(obviously not in an enclosed box) but you get the point. catching and hunting live mice is great exercise for a snake that does not get any. which i believe is a reason for egg binding. thats why i try and feed a few live meals for the first month before mating just to give my girls some exercise
adam
.but if a snake gets that beat up and does not attack back their was something wrong with the snake imho.
I'm not sure that I believe this to be the case, Ryan. I think it has more to do with the fact that killing a mouse is something that most snakes only do when they are hungry. Snakes are not particularly smart animals, so they rely on instinct. Instinct tells a snake to kill a mouse when the snake's hungry, and to flee a mouse intent on making a meal of it. Can't do that in a captive enclosure (as has been stated by others). It's hard for us to conceptualize that they cannot make the connection between killing for sustenance and killing for defense, but this seems to often be the case.Fenderplayer108 said:.
I will tell you why a snake won't fight back. It's because of breeders, its because of breeding efforts. We breed the snakes to eat F/T meals, which is what there nature is. It's not a choice on the "snakes" part, its just the snake does not have it in there nature anymore.
.Roy Munson said:I'm not sure that I believe this to be the case, Ryan. I think it has more to do with the fact that killing a mouse is something that most snakes only do when they are hungry. Snakes are not particularly smart animals, so they rely on instinct. Instinct tells a snake to kill a mouse when the snake's hungry, and to flee a mouse intent on making a meal of it. Can't do that in a captive enclosure (as has been stated by others). It's hard for us to conceptualize that they cannot make the connection between killing for sustenance and killing for defense, but this seems to often be the case.
Having said all of that, I've seen quite a few examples of corn snakes killing mice that they didn't end up eating. But this doesn't really prove anything. These snakes may have been hungry enough to kill, but for some other reason they rejected the mouse (e.g. prey too large; funky odor).
I think that line says it all!MegF. said:We put food in there when they aren't hungry and expect them to eat.
I still want to know how you would plan on stopping a mouse or rat before it bites your snake. How do you know when it's going to bite?
Fenderplayer108 said:.
.
That is probably the most ignorant thing I have ever heard on this site. If a helpless child was getting attacked by a adult, and the child didn't fight back, there is something wrong with the child?
This isn't an attack, but comparing an adult human to a snake is an even worse comparison. You're assuming that a snake's feeding instincts and defensive instincts are connected in the same way that an adult human's are. Snakes are not capable of rational thought. You and I realize that our offensive weapons can also be used defensively. Snakes don't necessarily make that connection. A snake that doesn't use its offensive skills defensively is not necessarily a weak specimen. :shrugs:farfrumugen said:sorry if i offended you but it is not ignorance by any means it is a completely logical statement.
as far as your comparison goes you need a better one, a human child compared to an human adult is not even close to the same. it would be more like an adult human being attacked by a chicken.