The results you got were not because the two mutations are allelic, but here's the history. When Walter Smith asked me--years ago--if I had an adult female Bloodred with any white on its sides, I sent him the only one I had at the time (she had perhaps 1/20 of the lateral white on the male McDonald-Line pied-sided corn he mated to her). Something like 20 babies revealed NO lateral white, so the presumption was that either the white on mine was not the result of a mutation OR that the two parents possessed mutations that were on different alleles. Sure enough, when I raised some of my share of the breeding co-op, I got SOME p/s babies. Also, when I bred one of those males to the original SMR-Line female, half the babies were p/s. This demonstrated that all of the F1 babies were, of course, het for both p/s alleles. Since then, many have been bred back and forth, to the point that some of them are homozygotes for one of the lines, but only het for the other. Some are double-homozygotes, expressing white from both Lines, and that is likely why you got p/s homozygotes via pairing yours with a McDonald animal. Since there are no outward markers for either, it's essentially impossible to say which allele is possessed by a respective visual P/S Bloodred. Likewise, some McDonald-line homozygotes out there could be het for SMR-line, and vice-versa?