No see that one was because of the "retarded" gesture
unch:
Anyway, when I have children I will teach them. Not kill the copperhead because children imitate their parents so what if the child says. "Ok I"m gonna kill the copperhead because daddy does!" See I also have severe ADHD. And I have had it drilled into me not to play with unfamiliar animals but I have learned and I do herp for copperheads occasionally. It is just so dumb to kill an animal that is really helping you. If you avoid the animal and educate your children and don't show them that DESTRUCTION of nature is right, no worries
Whatever, perhaps it was deserved then, that particular comment was rhetorical, however the sarcasm in the sentence previous to that was very obvious.
I think was is infuriating me the most is how you obviously are taking what I have to say on the subject out of context, including the points that are in support of your point of view, and how you blithely avoid answering very pointed questions.
I understand that the chances of a bite are low, however, is the damage you see on the page above something that you are willing to inflict on your little niece/nephew (edited to add: after re-reading I realize it's your half brother but the questions still is valid) that you mentioned caring for?
So, beyond "teaching them" about snakes and hots, would you take a chance, however remote, about inflicting that sort of damage on your little brother?
How would you feel if that little boy, who follows you out herping and looking for copperheads, decided that one day, on his own, was going to do what "big brother does" and go out on his own to look for snakes... and got bitten.
You can sit there and say it would never happen that he "knows better" but let me assure you that it DEFENITELY could... You said yourself that children imitate what they see.
THis is a very valid and poignant question as well, perhaps you should take a moment to consider this point of view:
For those of us who don't have children, a good question to ask ourselves is this: How would I feel if my parents did not put me first were I in potential danger?
Again, let me stress, that I am not advocating killing as the first and ONLY option, which, if you had bothered to fully read any of my previous posts, you would know that. However, there are some serious issues around children and dangerous animals and I am very very concerned by the fact that you seem to continually gloss over that fact. Especially when you've also claimed to be "responsible" for the well being and safety of a child.
You are certainly mature enough to at least be able to comprehend both sides of things even if you do not agree with them. That is the beauty of being able to debate a point.
I can certainly see your point of view, once upon a time I thought very much like you did, and to a certain extent still do, I would always take education, relocation, or other measures before extermination, however there are limits to that.