Thats sucks! I did try to tell you how to solve it. Sorry to hear the terrable outcome...
I know Stephen, and I had fully expected to use your advice. Tim had even bought what we'd need so we could get her taken care of before he got home that day only to find that we were too late. =(
Sucks that such a beautiful snake had to die... It makes me re-think breeding snakes and breeders themselves. I don't think I'll ever understand this aspect of the hobby. Personally, I wouldn't blame "Murphy", not at all. Sorry if this sounds harsh but that's pretty much how I feel.
I don't quite get the point(s) you are trying to make.
You stated in your post: "Sucks that such a beautiful snake had to die... It makes me re-think breeding snakes and breeders themselves." How does one tragic story make you 'rethink' breeding and breeders? Is it all stories like this, or just my tale? I could understand if you'd said that reading about what happened to our snake made you consider not taking the risk of breeding your own snakes (if you have any and had planned to breed them), but I don't get the part where the 'breeders' come in.
To me, and it just may be that I'm not reading your intent between the lines or reading something into them that wasn't your intent, it seems as if you are saying that because something bad happened to ONE of my snakes - that all snake breeders are wrong to breed snakes because something like this MIGHT happen again. Can you please elaborate on what you meant when you posted what you did?
"I don't think I'll ever understand this aspect of the hobby." I'm guessing you were referring to breeding here, and like Terri said, if not for snake breeders breeding snakes, there'd be no fancy morphs from recessive genes. I think there'd also be far fewer snakes available to people because the only way to procure an animal would be to capture one from the wild or buy one from someone who captured it from the wild.
There are, in many places, regulations against taking animals from the wild (due to a number of reasons) or limiting the number that can be caught, sold, or kept. So, basically, to sum it up - without breeders breeding more snakes there'd be far fewer people who could be enjoying their 'pets'. The whole idea is much more elaborate than that, but I just summarized it to reply.
Finally: "Personally, I wouldn't blame "Murphy", not at all." This is the statement that really bothers me the most. I see this statement as an underhand way of accusing me and my husband of being at fault for what happened to our snake. If you feel we are at fault, just say so - why bother trying to be subtle? I have always admitted to fault when I know I am to blame - whether intentionally or accidentally.
'Murphy' is not another person we are trying to place blame on - 'Murphy' is simply a way to represent the notion or belief that sometimes bad things happen and you can't do a dang thing about it. 'Murphy' is the unknown or unexpected factors that throw a wrench in the best laid plans. Simply put, 'Murphy' is the bad luck that sometimes visits people at the worst possible moment.
You could argue that since we knowingly bred Magnolia that the blame is inherently ours because she'd still be alive if we hadn't taken steps to breed her. So, what about the other 11 snakes we bred this year that had no trouble laying their clutches? Those were just flukes? We were simply lucky? That they are just future accidents waiting to happen?
But, by your logic 'LUCK' good or bad, doesn't figure into any portion of the breeding. Meaning that it must be something we did that made those 11 females have good clutches and we must have done something wrong with the 1 female that didn't. Even though we gave the SAME exact care to each of those 12 snakes.
Gave all twelve properly prepared lay boxes, made sure all twelve always had clean, fresh water available, and offered each of the twelve the same number of meals during their gestation period. Monitored their conditions, both before and after breeding them, as well as monitoring them during and after the laying process.
And yet, even though those other 11 had no troubles, we are doing something wrong because we lost this one female before we really even had a chance to do anything to help her.
Is this what you meant or did I miss your point completely? Am I only partially right? Way off base? Please, correct me and clarify your post. I'm open to hearing other people's opinions.