Quote:
Originally Posted by ecreipeoj
This breeding and other RedCoat x Non-RedCoat breedings is beginning to make me believe that RedCoat is co-dominant like Diffused, and perhaps even variable like Diffused. Being co-dominant, means that you can see the effects of the gene as het, like Diffused. A Het RedCoat has a slight coat of red color and homo RedCoat are the intense RedCoats I have posted photos of.
I believe Champagnes are homo RedCoat.
|
Ok adds to the confusion lol If is co-dom like this how much red would you say is a slight coat? I personally do think the gene is more apparent when combined with amel and ultramel from what I have seen here. Is just a guess since I am new with the gene. So if this is all the case about it being co-dom it would make the gene far more prevailant in the gene pool. Such as the breeding I did with it last year to an anery with no apparent signs of the gene. I have three breedings with the male this year an anery stripe, a pure hunt club, and a normal het diffused, sk, amel to compare results and outcomes of red in the offspring. With last years clutch none of the snow and aneries are showing signs of even het with the gene while all the amels, the ultramel and some of the normals have varrying degrees of red to them. I am going to borrow pics of these to make the comparisons with for now. First up is the ultramel female, then amel male, then thier sisters of the clutch. So am I way off base on this or am I looking at something else?