• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Anery A Bloodreds...

Kat said:
Sulfur sounds like a better match for butter bloodreds, and I have to say the pics have me agreeing with the Granite name for anerys...

But I can go either way on the name vs morph + pattern discussion. I think I'd prefer to leave the combos as morph + pattern until an appropriate name comes along, rather than assigning one quickly that doesn't really conjure up images of the morph...

-Kat
Click to expand...

I totally agree with Kat on this one. We might be jumping too ahead of ourselfs and start naming the morphs without knowing what it would look like as adults.

I also understand that if we started to use just the genetic make up of the corns then things are going to start to get crazy. It might be hard for us to change the name again once we see the adult version of the snake.

Also if we start to get a 5 genetical homo snake then we would be typing something like Lava Amel Caramel Bloodred Motley.....which would really be a bad advertising name.

I agree with Walter that it might be easier to just name colors with 'Trade Names' and just add the color mutation to it.

I personally like the Anery Bloodred, Lavender Bloodred, Amel Motley naming more. Its just easier for me. But it might be because that I am more or less used to those terms. But if new comers comes along, they would have trouble figuring out what a Sulfur or Avalanche is. This is because we as breeders and 'more experienced' people can't even get this strightened out yet.

We should get a couple of poll threads up and say weather or not we should have trade names or not. If so, why? If not, why? We also should try and set a date so what we call can vote. Or a time interval so that most people around this forum would know about the vote to make it as fair to everyone as possible.

I don't know....but I am pretty much with Walter here with the 'trade names with color morphs and just add pattern mutations' kind of thing. But that's just me~
 
Again, Granite is already in print for a totally different morph of corn.

You're gonna have to come up with something different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top