Plissken said:I'd suggest either the snail or the fish, George. I keep both and I find them both very fun and interesting.
On the goldfish discussion - I have to go with Corny Noob. Goldfish can live for well over twenty years. I'd also agree that goldies are not easy to keep. Mine are a lot of work and learning how to set up the tank absolutely confused the whatsits out of me. :crazy02:
They are beautiful animals and tremendous fun to keep but they are undeserving of the 'simple, minimum-commitment pet' stereotype that seems to be attached to them.
Tula_Montage said:Only a fish lovelr says that LOL
Seriously though, I respect what you guys are saying, but from what I imagine a parents point of view would be, a bowl does just as good. Considering kids tend to get bored of new things very easily, its ok for mum to spend a few £'s on a bowl and literally pennies for the fish, whereas a big aquarium with filters and lighting will cost hundreds of pounds. Thus why I hated keeping turtled LOL. Too much work, too much money.
What I'm saying is tomaeto, tomato :shrugs:
Tula_Montage said:Sure thats for aquarium enthusiasts who want to give their fish ideal environments. I have successfully raised golfish in glass bowls and had them live in excess of 3 years. My mother had done the same, and I'm sure her mother did too.
I would not keep fish without filters anymore as changing the water so often is a pain in the bum, but it can be done.
Its the same senario as people housing corn snakes in little plastic tubs, where as others would say this is completely wrong and imply that keeping corns in a 4ft tank with as many unnecessary branches and decorations as possible is the ideal lifestyle. Again it's down to personal preferance.
Lore said:Indeed... I remember having a goldfish that I won at a carnival when I was like 6 or 7 that I had for a good 3-4 years and it only died because the cat got it :eek1: & it was only in a glass bowl & fed when I remembered to. :shrugs: