• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Mt. Whitney for Lunch

tyflier

tyflier

[Insert Witty Commentary]
I took my girlfriend and her daughter to The Alabama Hills for lunch today. They had never seen the world-famous "Mobius Arch", so we stopped there first...

girls-and-arch.jpg

The Girls, The Arch and Mt. Whitney

Countless photographers have taken this photo over the years. Everyone that has visitied the Hills with a camera has come home with a shot of Mt. Whitney through the arch. I couldn't stomache taking the same shot, so I had the girls climb up under the arch to change it up a little bit...

sage-to-summit.jpg

Sage to Summit

tunnel-view.jpg

Tunnel View

northern-hills.jpg

North to Independence

Thanks for taking the time to look, and as always, comments and opinions are very much appreciated!
 
Thanks, everyone, for the input!

The last shot is my favorite of the day. The clouds were absolutely incredible, and their softness was such a cool contrast to the sharp, hard rock formations and jagged mountain peaks...

Anyhow...thanks again, for looking!
 
Chris, I know I say this all the time. But amazing photo's. I am surprised your stuff doesn't find its way into National Geographic, or something like it...
 
Outcast said:
Chris, I know I say this all the time. But amazing photo's. I am surprised your stuff doesn't find its way into National Geographic, or something like it...
Click to expand...

Oh, I've had my share of local publicity. Certainly nothing as big as Nat Geo, but I've been in several local magazines and newspapers, hung in local galleries, and even had the opportunity to display in the San Jose Museum of art for several months as part of the "Ansel Adams: Early Years" show.

To be honest, if nothing else ever happens with my photography, the fact that the SJMA requested one of my shots to display alongside Ansel Adams makes me an incredibly successful photographer. I didn't get paid for it, and I didn't even get to display my name with my shot...but it was there. And not to sound like I am bragging, but I am the only photographer I have ever met to display in a museum, even though it was a digital display instead of an actual print...
 
It sucks that they did not display your name with your photo. But, that is awesome that you are getting local recognition. Your photo's deserve something. They are always amazing.
 
Outcast said:
It sucks that they did not display your name with your photo. But, that is awesome that you are getting local recognition. Your photo's deserve something. They are always amazing.
Click to expand...

It's not so bad. My name is associated with that photo all over the internet, and it's a shot that simply cannot ever be reproduced, so...I'm ok with that. The name of the photo was displayed, and people have found it, and me, by searching the title, so...it works...

Thanks so much for the positive support!
 
amazing pictures as all ways but I do have 2 questions. Is there a reason you use b&w most of the time? I dont mean that in a bad way it all I think the clouds of some of you b&q pictures are just...I dont know words to describe them. and the other was. Whats the name of the picture you were talking about?
 
I am still in awe of how everything in the photo, from the shrubs in the foreground to the mountains in the far back is in crisp focus! It is so unreal!
 
Nitelion94 said:
amazing pictures as all ways but I do have 2 questions. Is there a reason you use b&w most of the time? I dont mean that in a bad way it all I think the clouds of some of you b&q pictures are just...I dont know words to describe them. and the other was. Whats the name of the picture you were talking about?
Click to expand...

Whoops I meant the clouds in the b&w pictures*
 
Nitelion94 said:
amazing pictures as all ways but I do have 2 questions. Is there a reason you use b&w most of the time? I dont mean that in a bad way it all I think the clouds of some of you b&q pictures are just...I dont know words to describe them. and the other was. Whats the name of the picture you were talking about?
Click to expand...
I use B&W because it forces the viewer to look at the shapes, lines, contrasts, textures and dynamics without the interruption of color. I want to show landscapes that are stark, foreboding, barren, and bold. The easiest way for me, personally, to accomplish this is to remove the distraction of color.

I also find that B&W is much more challenging to convey. What I mean is that color is permanent. Red is always red, blue is always blue, green is always green. In B&W, red, blue, and green are identical tones. Knowing this, it gives me the challenge of creating dynamic contrasts between similar tonalities, and also present me the opportunity to create the landscape I want you to see by removing the grounding aspects of color.

The name of the shot was "Storm Over Wheeler Crest"--
storm-over-wheeler-crest.jpg


Lennycorn said:
Care to tell us how that is done??.... Darling :roflmao:
Click to expand...
It's called "hyper focal distance". Basically, you focus on an area that is roughly 6-8feet beyond your nearest visual element. Using a narrow enough aperture, this will bring everything from 3' in front of the camera to infinity into crisp focus. There are more complex calculations going on, and of course intricate compositional tools you can use in conjunction, but that's the gist of it...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top