Well the thread/topic seems to be winding down, but I'd like to get just a couple more thoughts in . . . imagine that huh?!
First I'd like to thank MegF and eddie for the positive help in answering my question way back in post 16:
Drizzt80 said:
If not, what is the actual benefit to 'legally' using FedEx versus using UPS or DHL??
Even with the sidetracking that went on, those two gave real answers to the question at hand and didn't try to cloud the situation. While MegF's representative gave a very glowing description of what is supposed to happen when a shipment is question, it in now way 'guaranteed' that it wouldn't be delayed either. Therefore, Serp's (helpful) graphic image is inaccurate. Though the chances of a seized/held/delayed would be greatly reduced they cannot be guaranteed. Which reallistically is to be expected who can give a 100% guarantee on anything but death? It would seem as though the 'benefit' of using FedEx is inner beauty and strength in the knowledge that you're supporting a company that supports the reptile community, even though they may potentially delay a shipment along the way potentially causing the death of an animal along the way though the chances are slim . . . the reality is they just found a way to make an extra buck. It's not about money, but there's no added benefit that way either since all the companies are about the same price.
Unfortunately, that elitist attitude surrounding this issue really baffles me. While thinking the issue through, especially after
bill38112's post, I came to a realization. I'm wondering if those of you that 'refuse to purchase from someone using UPS' have the same set of 'ethical' standards towards those that 'post and frequent Kingsucks.com'? It's basically the same issue:
1. UPS and FedEx deliver merchandise.
2. Kingsucks and CS.com are discussion based forums directed towards Corn owners.
(Since this is the 'real' issue at hand here . . .)
3. FedEx 'supports' the breeder (by allowing them to be certified shippers), UPS does not by forcing the breeder to fly 'under the radar'. It's apparently unethical to use UPS.
4. CS.com 'supports' the corn enthusiest by allowing open conversation without the censorship of posts and information, Kingsucks does not. (no explanation necessary.). I would think that supporting this censorship by Kingsucks is just as ethically important to the corn snake industry and 'world' as who does/doesn't allow to ship . . . no? There's some pretty important people, past and present, from around here that frequent that board! :shrugs: (Just for the record, I don't participate there any longer, but also DON'T feel a 'drive' to ostracize and look down upon them . . . it's a valid question though . . .)
Finally, How about that person that does not have access to FedEx locally? Are you ostracizing them simply because they are forced to use UPS?
Just some more thoughts on the subject that others wanted to bring up since my question was answered . . . again, thanks to MegF and eddie.
D80