Cflaguy said:
If Florida was an independent and then in the ACC, they would have many more title shots as well.
To say Florida won their first against a flu stricken team. Not Florida's fault. Then to say Florida State would of had a third title if Weinke hadn't been hurt. Excuses. You still gotta play the game.
As far as last year, we saw who the best team was. Michigan had their chance and lost. Why should they have had another chance? Michigan in fact lost four in a row.
Florida has beaten FSU how many years in a row? Even with Zook.
What does, "...readjust the record books to show that FSU was in fact National Champs in 1996." mean?
Don't have to tell me the year of the Gator is over. College ball changes every couple of years. But get them while ya can. These guys are young... but they are good.
You're laughing at the Outback Bowl? A News Year Day Bowl. Will FSU make it back to the.... Emerald Bowl? A two day after Christmas Bowl.
Now having said that, I hope FSU wins the ACC.
Funny, the University of Florida blocked FSU's admission into the SEC for how many years? In 1991, after nearly 30 years of trying to gain admission to the SEC, FSU agreed to become the 9th team of the Atlantic Coast Conference.
If you doubt those facts, reference the article 'FSU and the ACC' written in 1991 and found in the 'Florida Times Union'. It gives a very telling history about FSU's conference affiliation and the steps it took to try and gain entrance into the SEC for all of those years---only to have the ACC come along in 1991 and offer a package better than the SEC finally offered.
To state that FSU would not have become a dynasty or played in as many National Championship games if it had been in the SEC is delusional. Between the year 1990 and 1999, FSU faced UF 12 times. FSU's record in the series? 7-4-1. During the 1990's, UF was the cream of the SEC. FSU didn't seem to have an issue handling the SEC's best team on quite the regular basis, so why assume that would be any different on a week to week basis?
I never said that UF winning the 1996 Sugar Bowl was 'anyone's fault'. The fact remains that most of the FSU team, including just about the entire defense was either ailing from the flu or food poisoning. That game was very close at the half when 90% of FSU's team went into the locker room for IV treatment. Of course, like you said---that's no excuse.
What I do find comedically entertaining is what the Crier said last year. While trying to lobby for UF to weasel it's way into the Championship game, he flat out stated that a rematch between teams that played in the regular season was unfair. He said that if Ohio State had to replay Michigan for the National Title and lost---that OSU should make up rings and declare themselves Champs anyway.
Do you not find that to be the most comic display of irony? How did the University of Florida win it's 1st National Title? I do believe it was a rematch....and I do believe it was against Florida State----just 6 weeks after #2 FSU beat #1 Florida 24-21 in DCS. Why did Florida deserve a rematch in 1996, but Michigan didn't deserve a rematch in 2006? What's even funnier is the margin of defeat for both of those schools was identical---3 points.
Michigan lost what? To OSU? So what? What's the better loss? Losing at #1 Ohio State by 3 points, or losing at Auburn by two scores? A team that lost 2 games by a combined 39 points? Sorry, but I'd have to say that Michigan had the better loss.
And to answer your question, it's been 3 years in a row. That my friend, will end this year in the Swamp. UF had minimal success last year against FSU in Tallahassee, and this year FSU returns a much deeper team. They have found a quarterback that can do more than tuck the ball and run 15 qb draws in a game. The defense is monumentally better than UF's---and paybacks will be fantastic.
It's about time that the rightful order of athletics in the State of Florida is put back in order.
FSU > Miami > UF