It all depends upon what you are trying, or want, to produce.sprdonkey said:Anery? Amel Bloodred? Amel? What would I get if I bred her to my lavender motle? He's more than A little pinkish, one of Kathy Loves.
I would agree with Tula. Doesn't exactly shout "motley" to me, but I'm usually wrong...Tula_Montage said:Like I said, whats the belly like?
If she has a full checkerboard belly, she isn't a motley. Partial...maybe. But with a full checkerboard belly...not at all likely.sprdonkey said:White with pearly white pattern, I know she can't be a motley. Pattern on the belly isn't symetrical and looks like somebody drug an eraser up through the middle of it to her chin, but it is a checkerboard.
tyflier said:If she has a full checkerboard belly, she isn't a motley. Partial...maybe.
This is where I get really confused on the motley gene. With such an incredible amount of "acceptable variation" to the dorsal pattern, in my mind it only makes sense to have a similar amount of acceptable variation to the ventral pattern.Vinman said:nope, none at all, it can have a slight pepering to it and I mean pepering as a adult it should be nothing more than slighty bigger than the period at the end of my sentance. Some motley hets look just like motleys but they have a slight checkering to the belly I dont know if that is what you have seen. I have seen them mislabled all the time at shows. :shrugs: