As was said, lots of the crazy morphs are wild in origin......i wouldn't think that a morph would just develope on its own in the wild..
It's a great looking snake Allison, but you should release it really..... I have pm'd you with the best method of release for the snake...... It makes more sense than anything else I have read.....In my excitement I forgot to make an important note. Notice the head in comparison to the older photos, more pigment came off!
It's a great looking snake Allison, but you should release it really..... I have pm'd you with the best method of release for the snake...... It makes more sense than anything else I have read.....
Because I am smarter than the average bear.... LOLWhy would you release it? It is likely a new WC morph and you want her to release it because that makes more sense than anything else? I am sorry but I don't see the logic in that even if you are a person that is touchy about WC animals.
My bets would be on either paradox, pied, or axthanic(lack of yellow). I think thats an awesome find and you (or someone else) should test breed it.
Axanthism would not create a pattern of the mutation like that. As well...I can see yellow from the pics, so...you can rule that out.
Paradox...paradox what? Paradox normal? A "paradox" is something that is different from the normal for no known reason. So yea...I guess it could be a "Paradox Normal". But then again...every morph ever known as well as many abberant patterns would AL be considered "paradox", until their genetic reliability is proven. Wouldn't go with that one...
But I do agree that it should be tested and proven...
I also see no problem with keeping it. Garters are not threatened, and this one is absolutely not "normal". IMO, it would be much more conducive to progressing the hobby to breed it, test it, and prove it's genetic potential, than to release it to the wild with nothing more than a curious glance. Imagine where we would be if nobody ever kept and tested those "unusual" specimens they found in the wild...