I think what confuses a lot of folks is snakes being listed as '66% het' or '50% het.' The key point to make, which a lot of y'all have already stated, is it's a 66% chance or 50% possibility of being het for whatever trait.
I think if breeders are selling possible hets, they should be labled accordingly as possible not just as a %, because this really tends to confuse folks. Many breeders already do so, while others do not even identify possibles (usually the larger breeders--which makes for some nice surprises when you breed your lavs or butters and stripes pop out).
Lastly, just to reiterate, once a possible het is proven to be het through breeding trials, it is (and really always was) 100% het, but just could not be stated to certainty. This also confuses some folks when hets are stated as 100%, because it is either het or it is not het.
I think if breeders are selling possible hets, they should be labled accordingly as possible not just as a %, because this really tends to confuse folks. Many breeders already do so, while others do not even identify possibles (usually the larger breeders--which makes for some nice surprises when you breed your lavs or butters and stripes pop out).
Lastly, just to reiterate, once a possible het is proven to be het through breeding trials, it is (and really always was) 100% het, but just could not be stated to certainty. This also confuses some folks when hets are stated as 100%, because it is either het or it is not het.