Carlos said:
And Guys, wait to see the Blizzards when the Lava is in the mixt.LOL
I am not sure if you are joking or not by the “LOL” at the end, but I personally do not have high hopes for Lava Blizzards or Lava Snows as a whole. There may be some very unique individuals pop up that can be selectively bred for such as Coral Snows (Hypo Snows) that will prove me wrong.
I am sure that I have seen a few Lava Snows as hatchlings, but never held onto them. If I had raised them up, perhaps I would have seen some differences in them. I had to get a few from the many Het Lava Snow (Lava/Amel/Anery A ) breedings that I have done, but only one ever caught my eye which was a high pink one. I still have him, but he just looks like a high pink Snow Okeetee. I have never bred him to a Lava to prove him out. There must have been more. I did hatch out one Snow that looked like a glossy Blizzard with strong yellow on his sides, that may have been homo for Lava, but I never bred him either.
I did notice Amel Lavas in the clutches and saved them out and later proved that they were in fact Lava Amels. They are as different in a clutch as Sunglows and Amel Okeetees would be if they could be hatched out in the same clutch.
It is very likely that Carlos hatched out some Amel Lavas and perhaps Lava Blizzards last year. I remember him complaining that his first clutch from Hets for Lava Blizzard (Lava, Amel, Anery B) were mostly Amels and Blizzards. There wasn’t a single Lava in the group and he wasn’t sure if his snakes were actually het for Lava since he had bought them. It is very likely that there were some homo Lavas in that first group (Amel Lavas, Lava Blizzards), they were just not immediately recognizable to him. Carlos hit pay dirt in his second clutch and produced the first Charcoal Lavas.
Genetically, a Lava Blizzard or Lava Snow is pretty cool, but only time will tell if the combo has a certain mix that will produce a phenotype that will stand the test of time.