Austin M
New member
Austin I didn’t expect to agree with you but I do on many points. There were some big mistakes made by the banks and the building industry over the last decade. But it was not all a lie. There was a real building boom, with real people buying and living in those houses. Now some of those loans should not have been made, no question. But those people have been weeded out over the last few years. Those houses have been foreclosed on and resold at a loss to the banks.
This housing mess is much more complex then people getting loans they couldn't afford in my opinion.
I agree there was a real building boom. We may disagree that the real boom was bad for the country? Contrary to popular belief we have finite resources and maybe we should have been using them on something other than more expensive houses?
We have been loosing jobs and are still loosing jobs. So I don't think we are done weeding out those who got loans they couldn't afford yet. Oh, and I don't think the banks lost too much either. They made their money on the way up and our government, Republicans and Democrats alike, made sure they made money on the way down.
Many people who don’t kneel at the alter of debt made very good money during that decade. I was one. I have spent my entire life staying out of debt. It is one of my highest priorities. That does not say that I don’t borrow money or borrowing is bad because that is not the case. I borrowed a lot of money and I have invested it wisely and repaid all of those loans. I built several homes on speculation over the last decade and have sold all of them at a substantial profit.
What if I sold Kirby Sweepers for a living, and everyone who bought one got a $15k loan in order to pay for it. Lets say I was a debt free person. Although I may not kneel at the alter of debt I would be making a living off of the offerings layed at the alter of debt. If people stopped tithing at this alter of debt I may have to find new work weather I knelt at the alter or not?
If you sold your homes while the offering plate was full, kudos to you! Where would you be if you were sitting on those houses now though?
Why can’t the post office operate at a profit like UPS and Fed Ex? One very good reason is because they don’t need to. They are not a for profit business. It doesn’t matter if they waste money. It doesn’t matter if they move slowly. If they need more money they will just raise the price of a stamp. I mean it’s not like their customers are going to quit using the mail. It is the same with any government run “business”. The government has no place in business. Should never have been there to begin with.
So should we shut down the US postal service, public school system, fire departments, public libraries, or how about our public roads? Again I think I understand you point, but sometimes I wonder if for profit works for everything?
Name one single operation, function, enterprise, where the government is doing a better job than the private sector. I don’t need to wait for your answer because you and I both know there are none.
The military?:noevil: