• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Distintive belly pattern of emoryi crosses

vanderkm

New member
I have heard suggestions that the emoryi influence produces a distintive belly pattern in creamsicles and other crosses - clear in the central area with just the edge of the checkers along the sides of the belly.

I find it a bit hard to notice in my creamsicles because the belly checkers are so light, but I got a few photo of our yearling rootbeers and the three we kept back all have quite a different pattern from my normal corns. These are a cross of creamsicle corn to great plains ratsnake.

Thought I would post a few pics for people to consider -
the great plains ratsnake mom of rootbeers - girthy snake - a bit distorted by being closer to the camera than my hand - but she is a big girl - she seems to me to have similar checkers to what I see on my corns,
Crockett_belly.jpg


rootbeer yearling
saddle pattern
05_July_9_Mugzy_4_reduced.JPG


belly pattern - only a very thin black line along the side of the belly scales and faint tan checkers that barely extend onto the abdominal scale. They are this pattern full length and all from this clutch are similar.
05_Sep_17_Alba_belly_6_reduced.JPG


Is this something that others have noted - especially with crosses that have a high percentage of emoryi (aren't too diluted with cornsnake)?

thanks for looking,

mary v.
 
I know I won't be much help Mary, but I looked at one my RB's, ( they were hatched earlier this summer, so it probably is not any help for you ) and the tummy was checkered.. It is believed mine are 75% corn and 25% Em.. The tummy colouration is changing from white to a light orangy gold.. NExt year they should be something!

Regards..
 
? hmmmmmmm ?

I have heard this same thing said before but I'm not so sure it is an accurate assumption... Yes, my full Emoryi female has similar markings (the clear streak down the center) BUT I also have several FULL corns that have that same type pattern... a few are from my last Anery het Amel & Charcoal X Anery het Amel & Charcoal breeding and the other is a totally unrelated female Anery also het for Charcoal... and Hypo.

I have seen this pattern in other charcoals and charcoal hets also.

Could it be that some where WAAAAY-Back the charcoal gene could be tied in with the Emoryi genes?!?!?!

come on all you genetic wiz's -- feed us some knowledge!
 
The first pic is an adult Cream (50% Corn, 50% Emoryi.) His belly looks pretty corny. Normal checkers on this guy, it seems. Pic 2 is one of his rootbeer babies (75% corn, 25% corn) which is a sibling to Tim's(TandJ) Rootbeers. Her belly has very normal checkering. Both have more consistent checkering than some of my pure corns. I notice more of a broken belly pattern in my hypos.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0931a.jpg
    IMG_0931a.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 94
  • IMG_0934a.jpg
    IMG_0934a.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 94
taxonomically speaking, the only difference in ventral pattern between emoryi, guttata, and slowenskii that seems to be true almost completely across the board that can be counted and described completely is the number of coninuously checked ventrals. Corns have more than emoryi "ever" have.

KJ
 
Interesting pics - would really like to see some from pure emoryi and first generation crosses - as I find this interesting.

KJ - very interesting information and not something I had heard before, but it is often difficult to find and sort through the taxonomy information and I have not known where to find reliable descriptions. Appreciate you bringing that info -

mary v.
 
Back
Top