Rich in KY said:
Actually he/she asked:
Which shows, if nothing else, a lack of experience. Therefore as experienced adults, we should consider the age of this child when answering his/her question. We don't know if his/her parents want him/her to know how to kill a mouse. Would you want your daughter getting this information online or from you? And we don't know if this child is aware that frozen mice are an option. So many of us tried to do the responsible thing and educate this inexperienced child about feeding options for the snake. You did directly answer the question, which I'm sure you think is the right thing to do.
See...this sort of assumptive attitude is what bothers me about this topic.
A lack of internet ettiquette is in NO WAY indicative of a lack of experience in any other subject, first of all. It's hard to read, hard to follow, and doesn't bode well as a display of intelligence...but it in no way indicates a lack of exposure to situations, nor a lack of experience in snake keeping.
Is it really YOUR job to protect this person from the internet? I understand and appreciate what your intentions are. However...I am more willing to assume that his parents are aware of what he is doing, and what he is asking. Rest assured...if my daughter was on an internet forum asking a question or doing research...I would know about. And I would be absolutely
furious if she(along with myself) were treated in the same manner that this individual was treated. Why? Because you ASSUMED he lacked intelligence and experience, and in doing so, you also ASSUMED that his PARENTS lacked intelligence and experience.
That's a no-no, in my book. I would MUCH rather assume that he and his parents have already done what they could in their home, and having found no answers, decided to turn to this forum...where they expected to recieve honest opinions and answers to their questions...not a bunch of people assuming they know what is best for everyone else...
An excerpt from above:
...And we don't know if this child is aware that frozen mice are an option....
The truth is...you don't know ANYTHING about this individual. You don't know his experience level, his parental involvement, his education, his local resources, how many snakes he has, or ANYTHING about him, his family, and their combined experience.
So again...why be so negative in your assumptions(resulting in a very elite sounding stance on the subject..."Holier than Thou" attitudes, all around), instead of simply answering the question that was asked?
I would fully understand and appreciate the answers you had given("you" being a general term, not directly at you, Rich in KY), had the question been something like, "What is the best way to feed my snake?" In that instance, these answers would have been very appropriate. But that is not what was asked. And the answers given did NOT answer the question that was asked.
I'll be honest with you guys...if my daughter was online looking for information, and she recieved the responses that this individual recieved, I would feel
extremely insulted, and would not frequent this site anymore. That is NOT the sort of attitude that the majority of the members here would like to have displayed. This place is supposed to be a
family oriented information treasure chest...not an "elite community" where people assume everyone is less-experienced than themselves. Quite frankly...I am
embarrassed by the way this person was treated. I don't want to be part of any "elitist" group that looks down on people based on their age and
assumed experience level. That sort of BS is simply not fair...
FWIW...it is quite obvious, at least to me, that there is SOME amount of experience from this individual, simply because they KNOW that mice should be either killed or heavily stunned before feeding them to their snake. MOST inexperienced keepers would have simply fed live and not worried about. The very fact that he KNOWS the safest way to feed his snake, and only needs help in performing the task, *should* be indicative of not only a nominal amount of experience, but also a nominal amount of intelligence, rather than the converse assumptions he/she recieved...