• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

more photos from the golddust motley X Amel Bloodred clutch

I have been snapping these pics a they have been hatching out. Pretty much they either look like ultrmels of some sort or nice amels. I cant they have ruby eyes, but there is something going on with them. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • DSCN7019.JPG
    DSCN7019.JPG
    112.5 KB · Views: 192
  • DSCN7018.JPG
    DSCN7018.JPG
    92.5 KB · Views: 190
  • DSCN7022.JPG
    DSCN7022.JPG
    89.6 KB · Views: 192
  • DSCN7023.JPG
    DSCN7023.JPG
    101.6 KB · Views: 190
Well all you can get from that pairing are ultramels and amels.

I'm not expert, but I'd think just take away everything that looks like a nice amel and you'd be left with ultramels....

Right?
 
Awesome kids, Mike! Yeah, they look like ultramels to me. The quality of the black on them is different... "translucent-y" looking.

There's a lot of variation in how dark they are, eh? (Is it just the photo [or my crummy monitor at work] or is there one that looks almost amel and one that looks almost hypo?)

The F2s of those should be amazing! :D
 
no theres some variation in there

Serpwidgets said:
Awesome kids, Mike! Yeah, they look like ultramels to me. The quality of the black on them is different... "translucent-y" looking.

There's a lot of variation in how dark they are, eh? (Is it just the photo [or my crummy monitor at work] or is there one that looks almost amel and one that looks almost hypo?)

The F2s of those should be amazing! :D

The zig zag is much lighter than the others. They vary quite a bit. I'll post some good photos after they have shed. Thanks.
 
Back
Top