opinions...
ares,
i'm going to partially agree with you and partially disagree with you.in some instances i believe there can be right and wrong opinions and in some cases there are not. in the case of religion i think that no opinion can be refuted as there is no clear empirical evidence to deny any claim that christianity/judaism/islam/buddhism/etc. is the "true" word of god. in any case of that nature i will never refute anyone's opinion. now in any case where an opinion can be upheld by incontrovertible evidence i believe that there can be right and wrong opinions. i.e.-- in the 16th century the universe was geocentric by popular opinion. only through the collection of evidence contrary to this was this "truth" overturned.
now, in this vein of logic: if, as a pet owner, the well-being of our pets is our paramount responsibility, then putting them in harm's way in any instance would be an illogical conclusion. in my belief, there is sufficient evidence (possible cannibalism and digestive problems) that housing multiple snakes together poses a threat to their well-being, which makes the opinion that they can be housed together completely indefensible. (the same applies for live-feeding) --- anxiously awaiting replies, jim
p.s. it is the "opinion" of many people that african-americans/gays/jews/arabs/etc. are inferior and/or deserving of maltreatment. my point is, that some opinions should be argued and if found false, be discarded.---jim