• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

ultra amel +...

H

hediki

i luv them all.
ok, is it possible to do ultra amel lavernder or anery a or b or blood red? since they did it with caramel. and also ultra amel bloodred would be cool seeing that difused is co-dominat(i think) to amel and ultra is codominant with amel. :rolleyes: i wond wat the out come will look like for any of these. any 1 trying to make them?
 
hediki said:
ok, is it possible to do ultra amel lavernder or anery a or b or blood red? since they did it with caramel. and also ultra amel bloodred would be cool seeing that difused is co-dominat(i think) to amel and ultra is codominant with amel. :rolleyes: i wond wat the out come will look like for any of these. any 1 trying to make them?
Click to expand...

Of course it's possible. You'd have an ultramel lavender, ultramel bloodred, ultramel anery blood, ultramel pewter.

Bloodred is no co-dominant with amel in the same way that ultra is. They do not share a locus. Bloodred/diffused is co-dominant with everything---there is a big difference.
 
Diffused is not (nor can anything be) codominant to anything at any other locus. It is (variably) codominant to its normal allele, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top