-
Hello!
Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.
Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.
What's Going On With The Python Ban?
- Thread starter pridecity
- Start date
ShenziSixaxis
Sticking To The Ceiling
I don't think so, but am curious as well.
kathylove
Pragmatic & Logical
US ARK was instrumental in getting FWS to extend the public comment period. It just ended a couple of days ago.
We are all hoping that with the cold winter in Florida this past year making a mockery of the Rodda study, that FWS may back out. But politics are always more important than logic and reason, so who knows?
Here is the last memo about it from US ARK:
Last Chance Public Comment
DEADLINE August 2, 2010
The deadline for the USFWS public comment period regarding the proposed Rule Change is fast approaching. If enacted Rule Change would add 9 constricting snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. If you have not made public comment on the rulemaking go to www.Kill-RuleChange.com and follow the directions.
The justification for the proposed rule is the ‘Constrictor Report’ written by Gordon Rodda and Robert Reed of the USGS. Agency documents uncovered by USARK suggest the report may have been "manufactured" at the request of USFWS to support a predetermined policy preference to add these snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list. Once the report was produced it was “sold” to the higher ups at the agency as solid evidence to support a rulemaking.
A recent cold snap in Florida, and subsequent cold studies led by Frank Mazzotti of University of Florida and USDA Wildlife Services in Gainesville Florida have contradicted the USGS hypothesis that pythons could spread across the southern third of the US. 85% of the pythons in the two study groups died as a result of the cold, confirming the fact that feral pythons in the Everglades are not capable of surviving outside of south Florida for any length of time. Even in the very southern tip of the state the pythons are susceptible to cold weather. This evidence suggests that the problem was over exaggerated by USGS. When it gets cold pythons die.
Joining a chorus of criticism by top academics directed at the USGS Climate Matching and Constrictor Report, Dr. Frank Mazzotti testified before the US House Natural Resources Committee stating that pythons were a problem “likely limited to south Florida”. He went on to state that “the Lacey Act is an ineffective tool to address invasive species issues”.
In a critical look at the data set used by Gordon Rodda to create his climate matching model, Dave & Tracy Barker discovered that the data had been grossly mischaracterized in order to make it appear that pythons could live in much colder temperatures and at much higher elevations than the data truly suggests. The data set, long withheld by Gordon Rodda from public scrutiny, is now available for all to see on the USARK website.
All of the pertinent scientific documents mentioned above are available to be viewed on the USARK website at: http://www.usark.org/archive.php
The Lacey Act is NOT warranted to deal with an invasive species problem limited to the southern tip of Florida. Even if enacted Rule Change would have ZERO effect in dealing with invasive species. What it would do is shut down the Reptile Nation because of a policy whim at USFWS. It would destroy a viable economic engine and thousands of American families in a time of economic hardship and record unemployment.
Please Make Public Comment! Be polite, be professional and be persuasive!! Use the facts. Be better than those who misrepresent the truth. www.Kill-RuleChange.com
We are all hoping that with the cold winter in Florida this past year making a mockery of the Rodda study, that FWS may back out. But politics are always more important than logic and reason, so who knows?
Here is the last memo about it from US ARK:
Last Chance Public Comment
DEADLINE August 2, 2010
The deadline for the USFWS public comment period regarding the proposed Rule Change is fast approaching. If enacted Rule Change would add 9 constricting snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. If you have not made public comment on the rulemaking go to www.Kill-RuleChange.com and follow the directions.
The justification for the proposed rule is the ‘Constrictor Report’ written by Gordon Rodda and Robert Reed of the USGS. Agency documents uncovered by USARK suggest the report may have been "manufactured" at the request of USFWS to support a predetermined policy preference to add these snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list. Once the report was produced it was “sold” to the higher ups at the agency as solid evidence to support a rulemaking.
A recent cold snap in Florida, and subsequent cold studies led by Frank Mazzotti of University of Florida and USDA Wildlife Services in Gainesville Florida have contradicted the USGS hypothesis that pythons could spread across the southern third of the US. 85% of the pythons in the two study groups died as a result of the cold, confirming the fact that feral pythons in the Everglades are not capable of surviving outside of south Florida for any length of time. Even in the very southern tip of the state the pythons are susceptible to cold weather. This evidence suggests that the problem was over exaggerated by USGS. When it gets cold pythons die.
Joining a chorus of criticism by top academics directed at the USGS Climate Matching and Constrictor Report, Dr. Frank Mazzotti testified before the US House Natural Resources Committee stating that pythons were a problem “likely limited to south Florida”. He went on to state that “the Lacey Act is an ineffective tool to address invasive species issues”.
In a critical look at the data set used by Gordon Rodda to create his climate matching model, Dave & Tracy Barker discovered that the data had been grossly mischaracterized in order to make it appear that pythons could live in much colder temperatures and at much higher elevations than the data truly suggests. The data set, long withheld by Gordon Rodda from public scrutiny, is now available for all to see on the USARK website.
All of the pertinent scientific documents mentioned above are available to be viewed on the USARK website at: http://www.usark.org/archive.php
The Lacey Act is NOT warranted to deal with an invasive species problem limited to the southern tip of Florida. Even if enacted Rule Change would have ZERO effect in dealing with invasive species. What it would do is shut down the Reptile Nation because of a policy whim at USFWS. It would destroy a viable economic engine and thousands of American families in a time of economic hardship and record unemployment.
Please Make Public Comment! Be polite, be professional and be persuasive!! Use the facts. Be better than those who misrepresent the truth. www.Kill-RuleChange.com
HERETiC
New member
Sad but true.
The consequences of it passing are to terrible for me to think about.
The pythons aren't linked to any decline in natural wildlife in Florida. And they certainly aren't migrating to the nations capital, or even northern Florida for that matter.
If it passes they might as well add Ball Pythons, Carpet Pythons, and every other non-native snake to the list as well, which they WILL do.
MegF.
That's for sale???
It was passed, but then they reopened the comments. I already made comments and I resent my comments once they opened them again. Don't give them the idea to add other pythons to the list. The bill was written so that they can add snakes if they want. If you haven't already, you need to join USARK so that you can keep updated on this and other bills that threaten the keeping of snakes.