• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Studies on dog behavior!

Very cute...I've seen that "but Im doing it right!" look before...lol:rofl:

Do you ever do free shaping? Omg the things a clicker savy dog can invent...



During a free shap session I've captured my dogs targeting each others noses...its hilarious...they made it up and I rewarded it. Looks like a "smootch"... they will run headlong at each other when you tell them too.

Yes, free shaping is very fun! When my dog was recovering from a surgery, we did free shaping to keep her brain busy. I really want to free shape pushing a big ball into a net, like a goal.

The thing about the dogs kissing is hysterical.
 
Michael and/or Ricky,
How old are your German Shepherds? Did you get one before the other, or at the same time? Curious.

D80
 
Michael and/or Ricky,
How old are your German Shepherds? Did you get one before the other, or at the same time? Curious.

D80
Ciana is almost 3 yrs old and Nakita is almost 6. They both came from different breeders and we got them both as puppies.
 
So, Ciana came second into Nakita's home?

Could one or the other explain the following discrepancy for my own sanity please?

They have NEVER gotten into a fight, and if you called me a liar I would take it as a compliment. None of my dogs have ever gotten into a dog fight with one another, that is an absolute undeniable fact, and is the result of proper training.

If I would have had a group of large breed puppies to let Ciana romp with when I got her, most of her dog aggression could have been avoided.
If she was dog aggressive . . . well, the quotes speak for themselves. :shrugs:

D80
 
So, Ciana came second into Nakita's home?

Could one or the other explain the following discrepancy for my own sanity please?




If she was dog aggressive . . . well, the quotes speak for themselves. :shrugs:

D80
That's group of large dogs. Nakita has always been the most easy going dog in the universe, and Ciana treats her like a mother, and vice versa; Nakita treats her like she's her puppy. If she had more Nakita's to interact with she would know how to socialize better. Ciana's dog aggression isn't violent, and like with most dogs stems from insecurity. She wouldn't bite or fight, but she would snarl and bark. It's dog aggression, because it makes it hard to take her where there's other dogs, because of her boldness. Just exercise and socialization has helped her be with all our cats and dogs, so now we can have them all together with no excitement.
 
so now we can have them all together with no excitement.

This would imply that at some point you could not have them together without "excitement." Meaning that at some point there was "excitement."

They have NEVER gotten into a fight, and if you called me a liar I would take it as a compliment. None of my dogs have ever gotten into a dog fight with one another, that is an absolute undeniable fact, and is the result of proper training.

This would imply that there has "never" been "excitement."


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/never said:
* Main Entry: nev·er
* Pronunciation: \ˈne-vər\
* Function: adverb
* Etymology: Middle English, from Old English nǣfre, from ne not + ǣfre ever — more at no
* Date: before 12th century

1 : not ever : at no time <I never met her>
2 : not in any degree : not under any condition <never the wiser for his experience>

You should be able to see why we question you.
 
That's group of large dogs. Nakita has always been the most easy going dog in the universe, and Ciana treats her like a mother, and vice versa; Nakita treats her like she's her puppy. If she had more Nakita's to interact with she would know how to socialize better. Ciana's dog aggression isn't violent, and like with most dogs stems from insecurity. She wouldn't bite or fight, but she would snarl and bark. It's dog aggression, because it makes it hard to take her where there's other dogs, because of her boldness. Just exercise and socialization has helped her be with all our cats and dogs, so now we can have them all together with no excitement.
Dog aggression is different to boldness though, isn't it?
Do you mean she was nervous of other dogs or overly dominant?
Did she instigate fights with other dogs?
 
This would imply that at some point you could not have them together without "excitement." Meaning that at some point there was "excitement."
Whenever you get a puppy from a breeder there is baggage that will only reveal itself when you take the dog home; just ask Bekers. I'm saying "moot point" on this one.

Dog aggression is different to boldness though, isn't it?
Do you mean she was nervous of other dogs or overly dominant?
Did she instigate fights with other dogs?
Dog aggression was a loose term that was classified by multiple professionals. Insecure is nearer the mark. She's a lover by nature, and has a very playful disposition, she was just unsure in the beginning. Luckily as we near age 3 she's shed herself of that insecurity. Her behavior could have led to instigating fights if put in that environment, but that's what she trained for and the proper steps were taken at a young age to prevent that behavior.
 
Dog aggression was a loose term that was classified by multiple professionals. Insecure is nearer the mark. She's a lover by nature, and has a very playful disposition, she was just unsure in the beginning. Luckily as we near age 3 she's shed herself of that insecurity. Her behavior could have led to instigating fights if put in that environment, but that's what she trained for and the proper steps were taken at a young age to prevent that behavior.
My old girl Ellie could have been a nightmare in the wrong hands. She developed such a dominant personality around other adult bitches that I have no doubt she would have been a fighter without early socialisation and firm control.
Her intentions were not playful at all when she had the 2 fights in her life, with a GSD and a Rottweillor bitch that each attacked her out of the blue, offlead. Ellie's response both times was shockingly swift and thorough but stopped short of serious injuries on my command.
 
Whenever you get a puppy from a breeder there is baggage that will only reveal itself when you take the dog home; just ask Bekers. I'm saying "moot point" on this one.

So if we point out an inconsistency, that makes it a "moot point"? Please clarify.
 
So if we point out an inconsistency, that makes it a "moot point"? Please clarify.

Kinda like where you(yall) say that "everytime the dog sees a snake, it instinctively lays down", yet yall post a picture of that clearly not happening.

Surly, you can see the obvious confusion.
 
aggression isn't violent


* Main Entry: ag·gres·sion
* Pronunciation: \ə-ˈgre-shən\
* Function: noun
* Etymology: Latin aggression-, aggressio attack, from aggredi to attack, from ad- + gradi to step, go — more at grade
* Date: 1611

1 : a forceful action or procedure (as an unprovoked attack) especially when intended to dominate or master
2 : the practice of making attacks or encroachments; especially : unprovoked violation by one country of the territorial integrity of another
3 : hostile, injurious, or destructive behavior or outlook especially when caused by frustration


Huh? What definition did you just make up for aggression that isn't violent. You CAN make up new definitions if you want, but why not tell us so we know what you mean with those new terms?
 
I'm truly getting confused by this conversation. If there is a misinterpretation on a circumstance I have presented, then please point it out so I can help clarify.

I think I get what is being asked, so I will explain.

I got Ciana from a breeder, she was three months old and the most independent of the three females left. I brought her home that day, and she was perfectly fine with both Nakita, and another German Shepherd we were dog sitting at the time. I would attribute her being friendly with them off the bat to it being a new environment, and they were both also German Shepherds.
I would take her for walks long walks around the lake where I lived, and she would occasionally bark at dogs that she would come across. One day we were playing in the water, and were charged by a couple of black labs. They were off leash, and when they barreled towards her she tried backing out of her collar. Once she realized she couldn't back out, she lunged forward barking. This caused the labs to take off, and I think it unfortunately reinforced her insecurity with other dogs, as well as create in her mind that her barking and lunging caused the scary dogs to leave. She was quite young, and this scared her quite a bit, as well as imprint a negative association to other dogs.
Shortly after that we enrolled in puppy fundamentals. She entered the facility, and barked at the other dogs as they were probably somewhat scary to her.
We were immediately separated from the rest of the dogs due to her barking, and had a barrier of baby gates and blankets between her and the other dogs. In hindsight this was only because the trainer had a bias against German Shepherds, and would have rather separated her than have to help socialize her seeing most of the dogs in the class were toy breeds. We did two six week courses, and took home a majority of the awards that they gave out to the dogs and handlers, but it didn't do much as far as socialization. I was upset by this because the awards did nothing to help her become better socialized, and I could have done that training from home.
After two sessions of spending my time and money doing classes, my trainer finally decided to say that I should really have private one on one help to work on the dog aggression issues. Needless to say I was angry, and think that some positive reinforcement trainers have a long way to go if they want to help all sorts of behavioral problems. Sure they can train a happy go lucky toy breed, but it takes a real trainer to help the real problem cases.
Anyways, I was recommended to take private lessons with a different trainer (finally!), so I scheduled it in. This trainer was incredible, and really helped Ciana and I to understand how positive reinforcement training really worked, and how to treat problems that the other trainer just could not, like aggression (which was simply just to let Ciana interact with others, the only reason I needed help in the first place). The problem was that Ciana was three months older, and more unsure of other dogs due to the first trainer excluding us from the socialization aspect.
We started off with a one on one meeting, in which I explained Ciana's behavioral problems (dog aggression), and what type of training she had received since I got her. At our first meeting with her and Ciana, we just let her roam the facility, and the trainer studied how I worked with her. As training went on we started introducing dogs. Ciana showed her usual display of barking and lunging, but not real sign of aggression (like "I'm going to fight this dog aggression"). The trainer then said that I should just let Ciana off leash to meet her dog, as she felt Ciana was more unsure than aggressive. Ciana was surprised as I dropped the leash, and ran to the other dog with her hair up. She sniffed him, circled him, and we then distracted her with a Frisbee and treats (no fight, biting, etc...).
We then upped the training to every few days to help socialize her, and it went very well. We have since been working with that trainer for the last couple of years, up until she moved to Colorado this spring.
So I repeat. Ciana has never gotten into a fight, although she does show signs of "dog aggression" to unfamiliar dogs. There was never a territorial fight of territory between Ciana and Nakita, or our Dachshund mix when he entered the house a year ago. She is very insecure around strange dogs as the result of poor socialization efforts by both the breeder, and our first trainer. Hindsight would say I should have dropped the class the first time I was separated, but that's life, and hindsight is twenty twenty. I spent a lot of money on classes, and thought they knew enough to help.
So I hope that properly clears up what seems like contradictory statements. Ciana has what some trainers label "dog aggression", but has never gotten into any fight, with any dog. She gets along wonderfully with the rest of the pack, and it requires no iron fist or dominance training.
Nakita lives with my mother now, but Ciana and her lived together for her fist couple of years, and never fought in that time. All of the dogs frequently see each other without incident, and have a happy relationship with our family based on love and respect.
 
Doesn't sound like dog aggression at all to me personally, and I'd have been amazed if your trainer would suggest dropping the leash in introducing an aggressive dog to hers.
 
Doesn't sound like dog aggression at all to me personally, and I'd have been amazed if your trainer would suggest dropping the leash in introducing an aggressive dog to hers.
Of course she wouldn't, that is why we decided to introduce them. I use the term dog aggressive loosely, as this is technically what her behavior was called. She was insecure, thus frustrated by the presence of other dogs, which made her bark aggressively.
 
How so? please offer where, otherwise I think you are simply trolling.

Am I wrong or did you not say that you, Ricky, and your mother lived together so that you could drive your mother everywhere she needs to go? You are the only one with a license, am I correct? You can't move out and live on your own or have your own job because they rely on you.

Yet your latest post says that Nakita now lives with your mother. Your situation could have changed recently, I don't know you. Just sayin'.

Plenty of other people have already pointed out other flaws in your story that I won't repeat.

I'm just a lurker, not a troll, but you are quick to throw that word around.
 
Am I wrong or did you not say that you, Ricky, and your mother lived together so that you could drive your mother everywhere she needs to go? You are the only one with a license, am I correct? You can't move out and live on your own or have your own job because they rely on you.
Yet your latest post says that Nakita now lives with your mother. Your situation could have changed recently, I don't know you. Just sayin'.
Plenty of other people have already pointed out other flaws in your story that I won't repeat.
I'm just a lurker, not a troll, but you are quick to throw that word around.
Maybe I could see the confusion in the "living together", but either that's not how it was stated or you misinterpreted it. We live in completely separate homes that are located on the same piece of land. We have our own privacy, lives, space, etc., and so does she. When she needs to get to work she's only a very short bit away so it's easy to bring her to and from work. Nakita stays at her house, Ciana stays at ours, but we live so close that they're able to socialize very often. This would be something pretty pointless to lie about, and as educated dog owners it would be quite irrelevant to the discussion.

My old girl Ellie could have been a nightmare in the wrong hands. She developed such a dominant personality around other adult bitches that I have no doubt she would have been a fighter without early socialisation and firm control.
Same with Ciana, though we've learned a lot about dogs through her. My brothers trainer actually thinks she had a person with a dog from the same litter as Ciana, and showed all the signs Ciana would have had if she wasn't handled properly. Goes to show that training is crucial in doggy development, and it's gratifying to know. Ciana's one tough beast, but she has grown so much and it makes us all proud to see the work pay off. Especially when you think of what might have been.
 
Back
Top