• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

amel fire or what

elliott54321

linkin park are the best
what the hell is this amle (fire ,candycane,lava) please can you tell me.
ell
 

Attachments

  • S3400026b.JPG
    S3400026b.JPG
    48.8 KB · Views: 90
  • S3400023a.JPG
    S3400023a.JPG
    31 KB · Views: 90
  • S3400024a.JPG
    S3400024a.JPG
    50.6 KB · Views: 89
  • S3400019a.JPG
    S3400019a.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 89
  • S3400040.JPG
    S3400040.JPG
    51 KB · Views: 88
Since I can see some small white banding around the saddles, I wouldn't call it a sunglow. What you have is a nice "regular" amel that happens to have a fairly colorful ground color.

To further explain the differences in the morphs you've mentioned:

candycane - amel that is selectively bred to have richly colored saddles and as white a background color as possible, hence the name.

sunglow - amel selectively bred to have NO white around the saddles and to have a richly colored background.

fire - actually a combination of 2 genes...amel and bloodred/diffuse (homozygous for both).

lava - one of the hypomelanistic morphs caused by a single recessive gene. You may be thinking of a lavamel, which is a combination of both amel and lava (homozygous for both morphs)
 
Back
Top