diabolical-good
New member
I'm no advocate of bringing any animals to the supermarket - unless it's human animals. I also think that our first thought as being responsible of our snakes and other reptiles should always be the concern for our animal's safety and health FIRST. - and not to endanger then from being suseptible to outside threats - be it a person, animal, whatever.
Having said that, however, I don't believe that the animal should be banned publicly. It's true that if people were more responsible with their animals - certain legislations wouldn't pass but - think about how many dogs have bitten people, knocked over and torn apart trash cans, dug up yards, gone without leashes and used someone's front lawn as a universal potty.
come on, now - no one is going to be banning dogs any time soon.
harmless snakes are just that - harmless. if I have a phobia of dogs and my neighbors's dog is outside, I'm pretty sure I'd have to stay inside or not walk out front, even if it were just to save myself from looking like a royal jackass because the neighborhoos retriever or poodle frightened me. Snakes are exempt from this courtesy only because of the ignorance of others, and preconcieved notions.
So I stick by speaking against laws that inhibit your rights wrongfully. Not only are such laws illogical, but they could at least be modified so that it doesn't ban all species. If you have a problem in your area about this you are perfectly entitled to write letters, call phone calls, get petitions signed to change the law. too many people don't know anything about this part of (the united states) system - thats largley how laws are made and passed, because the representative of the town, or whatever gets the idea of what his/her potential voters want.
And I's say at least be responsible to avoid stupid laws like that, by not being a jerk about the fact that you own herps. That just causes problems for the rest of us.
Having said that, however, I don't believe that the animal should be banned publicly. It's true that if people were more responsible with their animals - certain legislations wouldn't pass but - think about how many dogs have bitten people, knocked over and torn apart trash cans, dug up yards, gone without leashes and used someone's front lawn as a universal potty.
come on, now - no one is going to be banning dogs any time soon.
harmless snakes are just that - harmless. if I have a phobia of dogs and my neighbors's dog is outside, I'm pretty sure I'd have to stay inside or not walk out front, even if it were just to save myself from looking like a royal jackass because the neighborhoos retriever or poodle frightened me. Snakes are exempt from this courtesy only because of the ignorance of others, and preconcieved notions.
So I stick by speaking against laws that inhibit your rights wrongfully. Not only are such laws illogical, but they could at least be modified so that it doesn't ban all species. If you have a problem in your area about this you are perfectly entitled to write letters, call phone calls, get petitions signed to change the law. too many people don't know anything about this part of (the united states) system - thats largley how laws are made and passed, because the representative of the town, or whatever gets the idea of what his/her potential voters want.
And I's say at least be responsible to avoid stupid laws like that, by not being a jerk about the fact that you own herps. That just causes problems for the rest of us.