• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Dark Day in Ohio

EricRoscoe

New member
Exotic animal regulations head to Ohio governor

By ANN SANNER


The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Legislation that would tighten regulations on owning exotic animals in Ohio was headed Tuesday to the governor for his expected signature, months after authorities were forced to shoot dozens of lions, tigers and other dangerous wildlife released from a farm last fall.

The measure would ban new ownership of exotic animals, while allowing current owners to keep their creatures by obtaining a new state-issued permit by 2014 and adhering to strict new caretaking standards.

Facilities accredited by some national zoo groups would be exempt from the bill, along with sanctuaries and research institutions.

Ohio's restrictions on exotic pets are among the nation's weakest. Efforts to strengthen the law took on new urgency after Terry Thompson released 50 animals — including black bears, mountain lions and Bengal tigers — from his eastern Ohio farm in Zanesville in October before he committed suicide. Authorities killed 48 of the animals as a public safety measure. Two others were believed to have been eaten by other animals.

The Ohio House passed the measure 87-9 with changes on Tuesday, and the Senate agreed to the revisions, which included lower permit fees and a lower minimum insurance requirement than the version senators passed last month.

Permit fees for bears, tigers and other dangerous animals would begin at $250. And insurance policies for the creatures could range from $200,000 to as high as $1 million, depending on the number of animals.

Owners would be required to pass a background check and show inspectors that they adhere to care standards and have taken safety measures such as fencing their property. Signs would have to be posted on the property to alert people there were dangerous animals on the premises.

The bill cleared the Legislature after hours of testimony from distraught owners who had lined up in hearings to express concerns about having to get rid of the family pet or pay too high of a price to keep it, among other issues.

The Columbus Zoo and the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation are among the measure's supporters.
www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/exotic-animal-regulations-head-1443711.html
 
On the bright side:

Pit bulls will no longer be labeled as "vicious" dogs under a new Ohio law.

The measure that took effect Tuesday changes current law that defines a vicious dog as one that has seriously hurt or killed a person, killed another dog or is among those commonly known as pit bulls. The new measure removes the reference to pit bulls from the definition and requires evidence to prove pit bulls are actually vicious.


Gov. John Kasich (KAY'-sik) signed the measure in February.

Some dog wardens opposed it because of frequent pit bull attacks. Others have said pit bulls are not inherently vicious.
 
so what will this mean for reptile keepers? will ALL reptile owners have to obtain a permit? i *suppose* i could see large scale breeders having to do something like this, but what about joe schmo the hobby breeder? or someone who just has one or two reptiles?

yay on the pitbull thing! i am a bully advocate and am of the opinion "it's not the breed, it's the deed"...it's all about how they're brought up...
 
None of the Terry Thompson news ever made much sense. The original stories said the locks and fences were cut, but the keys were found in Terry's pocket.
He committed suicide with a shotgun (how easy is that?) which was not registered to him, even though hand guns (which were registered to him) were found in his home.
His body was surrounded by chopped up chicken parts.

Thompson kept his own zoo for public use; allowing celebrities to borrow his animals for photo-shoots or special PETA events.
source: http://newssimplified.com/ohio-government-to-blame-for-animal-massacre/3233/

Now PETA is saying "That's why PETA is calling on the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to exercise its authority to implement emergency regulations to prohibit the keeping of exotic and wild animals immediately. "
source: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/tags/Terry+Thompson/default.aspx

Typical PETA.

I guess one could simply ask Kasich any pertinent questions or invite him over.
http://www.governor.ohio.gov/Contact/ContacttheGovernor.aspx
 
I think only venomous snakes, burmese, retics, anacondas, and rocks are banned for the snake part. And yes Dave Partington, I don't think the story makes much sense either! Convenient how it was raining that day--no fingerprints could be lifted. If HSUS or PETA really wanted Ohio to have stricter laws (they did!), I would not put it past them to do something drastic.
 
Back
Top