MohrSnakes said:I believe it has been proven to be simple recessive but again, Rob is the guy to talk to on that one. I have produced what I would consider a dilute normal but the animal died shortly after hatching so there is always a chance it was a weird light color because of something else. And no...I don't have pictures.....just didn't think of it that soon and well....it was too late by the time I remembered my camera. I've had the dilute gene pop up in my lava motley project and have produced dilute anery motleys and what I belive to be a dilute anery and in the next couple of years I should be able to see if it works with normal motley and lava.
Ah....couldn't tell you. It was 2 years ago and I don't remember much about it except for it was light colored. The dilute thing wasn't really known back then so I didn't think a whole lot about it anyway.JFDery said:Thanks, I've sent him a message, we'll see what he says.
Regarding your unusually light animal, do you remember if the light coloration seemed associated specifically to reduced melanins or do you think the mutation was affecting dispersion (or production) of the red/orange pigments?
I'm hoping...but I have yet to see what I would condsider a dilute lava...but I'm trying again this year.JFDery said:Dilute with Lava must be quite outstanding...
Well, I guess more breeding trails are in order! Looks like another one of those fun what the heck is going on projects.JFDery said:Thanks Jeff,
so Rob says the dilute gene has been proved recessive with anery specimens, that are not motleys. He also believes that he has non anery animals that carry the dilute gene, but did not mention if it's in a homozygous or heterozygous state.