I couldn't agree more. I syringe fed Lil, then progressed to force-feeding until she finally started eating, not once did I get any bleeding or injury to her mouth, and I'm just an amateur who's force-fed and raised baby birds before having snakes to deal with.Have to say I agree with the above. Bleeding after force-feeding is not normal and they don't have "sensitive gums". What a crock. You can knock teeth out and graze, tear or injure the inside of the mouth or throat if you're rough, catch an instrument on them or don't use enough lubricant on the food item. They don't bleed spontaneously.
An admission that something went wrong and an immediate apology wouldn't have brought your babe back but at least it might indicate that the vet wouldn't do it (whatever it was) again. I'm so cross on your behalf.
I am SO sorry for your loss! Poor little one. Sounds as if the vet was way too rough, and, if I know most vets (and here at Collie Capers, with all our animals, I DO know most of them in this town, they rarely take responsibility for their mistakes, let alone admit to making them! Maybe they don't have malpractice insurance like docs do....
You are correct. With little to no possible gain for an attorney it would be very hard to find one to take your case. However, some may be willing if you put up cost and fee money up front. Risky.IIRC, they do have malpractice insurance, however, you can't sue for pain and suffering, only for the "economic value" of the animal as measured by an archaic legal set of rules based on food animals (making pet animals virtually worthless and purchase price, again, IIRC, not very relevant either). Because of the unlikelihood of a large jury award, attorneys don't want to take vet med-mal plaintiffs because it won't be profitable for the attorney. So it's all rather difficult to do any large scale financial damage to the vet. Maybe someone who knows more than I do can correct any inadvertent errors I made in this post...