albertagirl
Sharan
Anery Motley, Sunkissed Ghost Motley, Sunkissed, and Red Motley Hypo thingy.
What a colorful bunch! Sunkissed makes everything better.
Anery Motley, Sunkissed Ghost Motley, Sunkissed, and Red Motley Hypo thingy.
What a colorful bunch! Sunkissed makes everything better.![]()
The "Mystery" Corn clutch has been going through their first shed skins and now I'm wondering if it isn't Redcoat affecting the color?? The Striped Ghost I hatched in the clutch early on has also shed and colored up significantly!!
Thanks Walt!!Hope you figure it out Steve....it's very interesting for sure.
Those first two pics. look like what I would think a Ghost Kastanie would look as a hatchling.
I know you mentioned the genes invloved and Katstanie isn't one of them, but ya never know these days :shrugs:
Walter
:crazy02:BOUT' CORNS !!
Awesome hatchlings!!
I bet the mystery animal is one of those 'late developers'! I hatched one of these a few years ago and it got its red pigment later from shed to shed. That one looked exactly like your mystery animal and got the same amount of red on its laterals after first shed. If this one would be an amel it would hatch like a snow and turn out to be a regular amel a few sheds later.
Since Frank Schaub hatched some ghost kastanies last year, I'm pretty sure this one is no kastanie. Unfortunately Anery masks kastanie, so a ghost kastanie looks identical to a regular ghost. That combination was kind of a bummer...
Very nice comparison pic!
I've posted my late developer, so you can compare them too.
---> http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138775
One question: Are those Sunrise corns a linebred lineage or is it inheritable when you cross different lineages into the original one? I know Sunrise but here in Europe they are not really in demand.
Very nice comparison pic!
I've posted my late developer, so you can compare them too.
---> http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138775
I believe it's a recessive gene, as Don has them floating around in some of his Amels. I did many project crosses last year, so next season we will find out even more.
You proved that sunrise is either allelic to or the same mutation as kastanie, right?
Thanks, I found the thread now. The textbook term for the cross you did with the kastanie het amel diffused and the sunrise is "complementation test." Before DNA sequencing, it was the gold standard for testing whether different mutations are in the same gene.
There is a way to distinguish whether they are two different mutations in the same gene (allelic) or whether they are the same mutation, but I'm sure you've already thought of it. A gene can be recessive to wildtype but dominant over its other alleles. If we just assumed that kastanie and sunrise were allelic but not the same exact mutation, since you got babies that looked like mandarins from that cross, it would suggest that kastanie is recessive to wildtype but dominant over sunrise. So if you bred two of those mandarins together you would expect 3/4 of the hatchlings to look mandarin and 1/4 to look sunrise. But of course if the differences between mandarins and sunrise are due to line breeding or the different localities then that would complicate the interpretation. But it'd still be a cool "experiment."
My bet is that they are the same mutation and all of the offspring will look like mandarins, or that there will be a continuum of phenotypes.
Cool. When you say they are looking more like sunrise than kastanie, do you mean that those mandarin-looking hatchlings grew to look more like sunrise than mandarin?