• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Help me buy a lens please!

WingedSweetheart

WingedSweetheart

New member
A while back I bought a little Canon PowerShot SX210 IS and loved it. I still do love it. I was going to get a more expensive camera at the time because I did have the money. However I opted for the smaller camera because I thought it would be easier to carry around with me wherever I go. It has a 14x zoom which I notice I use a lot. I found I really love taking zoomed in detailed pictures of my snakes and bugs. I really like going outside and taking zoomed in pictures of tiny bugs on plants in my yard (who would of guessed I'd like that so much?).

Anyway I have decided to upgrade because even though my little camera does a good job, the pictures are not as crisp as I would like. I can't do anything but auto focus which I hate. A lot of times I'll try to take a picture and no matter how hard I try the camera focuses on something other than what I want.

Here is a prime example of auto focus frustration!
IMG_1030.jpg


Other times it takes perfect pictures!
WolfSpider.jpg


So now the choice for the new camera is Canon EOS Rebel T3i and I'm wanting to know for how I take pictures should I get the 18-55mm lens or the 18-135 lens? I know I could change lens later. However right now It would be too expensive as it's cheaper to buy the lens with the camera. I've read a few reviews and I am still stuck. Some people said the 18-135 lens didn't take as good pictures. I don't really understand since I am new to photography. I just like taking pictures and I want really detailed pictures!

Anyway, if you managed to read all that and give me your opinion I would really appreciate it.
 
The 18-55 mm is the better lens. Many folks find the the 18-135 won't produce acceptable photos except between f/8 and f/11.
 
It all depends on what you are interested in. Personally I would buy the camera with the shorter lens and buy a good telephoto later (since I'm into wildlife photography). And if macro is your thing then save up for a macro lense, there are lots of lense options out there which can be a bit overwhelming. I myself am stuck choosing between two macro lenses 100 mm (perfect for insect photography - so my research tells me); one has IS (image stabilization) the other does not, of course the IS one is sooo much more expensive than the non IS.

Hope that helps some

Amanda
 
Buzz and I shoot with the Canon P&S (SX20 & SX30) and with the Canon SLR. We have an 18-55 lens and a 75-300mm IS lens. Personally I think if you are doing macro photography the most I would stick with a lens that lets you get as close as possible to the subjects - there is a Canon macro lens that goes down to 8-10mm but it can be expensive so we opted to keep using the SX20 which has great macro capability. I also like my SX30 because it has a 35X optical and I did not have to buy the expensive telephoto lens to tote around with the SLR. It is all on personal preference but I love my P&S over the SLR due to cost and easiness of carrying in the field.
 
Thanks for all the help. I bought the camera with smaller lens. $599! I'll probably buy more lens once I lean more and get a feel for how the camera works.
 
There is a great rebate deal on Canon and Nikon for the holiday season. You might want to check online or with whom you bought it from and see if they have the rebate.
 
Canon rebates are instant.

The following Canon lenses are pretty good buys for those on a tight budget:
Canon EF 50mm f1.8
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS
Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS
 
I sent my T3i back for the T4i because it was the exact same price and it has a touch screen!!! I did get the smaller lens. I also found a flash kit for around $100 that has pretty good reviews that I may get later on.

Thanks for all the help.
 
Added Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 to my wish list. As soon as I get my refund from the other camera I'll probably be getting this. It's a hundred dollars more than the f/1.8. However it has a focus ring and from viewing examples of pictures taken with both. I liked the ones with the f/1.4 better.
 
WingedSweetheart said:
Added Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 to my wish list. As soon as I get my refund from the other camera I'll probably be getting this. It's a hundred dollars more than the f/1.8. However it has a focus ring and from viewing examples of pictures taken with both. I liked the ones with the f/1.4 better.
Click to expand...

Just out of curiosity why are you planning on getting a 50mm when your zoom lens covers that range?

Do you shoot a lot in low light?
 
I got it because it was smaller really. I should have got the body and lens separately. I use the smaller one much more when taking pictures of my frogs.

I'm new to all the different lens and flashes and I'm trying to learn. That is why I asked for some advice.
 
The f/1.4 and f/1.8 are equally sharp when stopped down a bit. The f/1.4 is built better (f/1.8 is plastic) but also has a fairly high rate of focus motor failures which is pretty unique for Canon lenses.
 
SquamishSerpents said:
My 50mm is one of my very favorite lenses. You absolutely cannot go wrong with it! Good choice on upgrading to a DSLR, too!
Click to expand...

I shoot Nikon but the 50mm f/1.8 is sharp as a tack and a fantastic lens, but I wouldn't carry both a 50mm prime and a zoom that covered it around unless I was shooting in low light and needed the 1.8.

:shrugs:
 
WingedSweetheart said:
I got it because it was smaller really. I should have got the body and lens separately. I use the smaller one much more when taking pictures of my frogs.

I'm new to all the different lens and flashes and I'm trying to learn. That is why I asked for some advice.
Click to expand...

Is it still wish listed or did you buy it already?

I'm just not sure that a 50mm prime is going to give you anything your 18-55mm isnt already, unless you have a need for low-light shooting.

I'd suggest you'd be better off with an external flash or (since it seems like you macro work) pick yourself up a used macro lens.
 
My mom has a ton of different lens and flashes with her old canon (it's a film camera). The flashes work on my new camera even though her's is about as old as me (I'm 27). I'm curious if her lenses will work too. I'm going to try them out and see.
 
Joejr14 said:
I shoot Nikon but the 50mm f/1.8 is sharp as a tack and a fantastic lens, but I wouldn't carry both a 50mm prime and a zoom that covered it around unless I was shooting in low light and needed the 1.8.

:shrugs:
Click to expand...

Personally, I wouldn't carry the 18-55mm kit lens at all. It is cheaply made, poor at autofocusing, and overall it is utter crap.

So I'm still voting for the 50mm, lol. If you want a zoom lens I'd forgo the kit lens completely and purchase body-only. That way you're not paying for the crap kit lens and you can put your money into either an external flash, a macro lens, or a zoom lens.
 
SquamishSerpents said:
Personally, I wouldn't carry the 18-55mm kit lens at all. It is cheaply made, poor at autofocusing, and overall it is utter crap.

So I'm still voting for the 50mm, lol. If you want a zoom lens I'd forgo the kit lens completely and purchase body-only. That way you're not paying for the crap kit lens and you can put your money into either an external flash, a macro lens, or a zoom lens.
Click to expand...

I was thinking of selling the lens I got with the camera. I like the little 50mm a lot better. I'll also be getting a macro lens because I love taking macro shots. All my little critters look so much better in macro!
 
SquamishSerpents said:
Personally, I wouldn't carry the 18-55mm kit lens at all. It is cheaply made, poor at autofocusing, and overall it is utter crap.

So I'm still voting for the 50mm, lol. If you want a zoom lens I'd forgo the kit lens completely and purchase body-only. That way you're not paying for the crap kit lens and you can put your money into either an external flash, a macro lens, or a zoom lens.
Click to expand...

I can't speak to Canon, but the Nikon 18-55 kit lens is far from 'utter crap'. It's actually a fantastic lens that's very sharp for what it is.

I just bought a 28-80 lens because I needed something for full frame, and I spent $53. The 50mm prime I have was given to me (costs about $75) and it's tack sharp. Many of the older AF lenses are tack sharp....and cheap. With older lenses cost does not always equal crap lenses.

That being said, it could be totally different for Canon. My point was there's really no need for a 18-55mm zoom and a 50mm prime if you don't have a specific need for low light photography. The zoom lens is fine for 99% of photographers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top