Ricky87
New member
Yes, and that's why I reiterate the views of those I know who do have the capacity to understand the meaning. If you've never been reduced to a word, how do you know how it feels?..How it causes you to feel trapped in the warped vision of how the majority sees you..As being less than everyone around you, to the point where over centuries it's adapted into your own language and culture. I find it ironic the word is only challenged once it gains another meaning, as though it should only possess one meaning; of racial hatred. Maybe it's just me, but I easily distinguish the love and hate within the word (biggest sign being that it either ends in "er" or "a", which is obvious!)..Not saying it's always used appropriately, or even that it shouldn't in time be replaced..Just saying I understand it..I can hardly blame Pruddock for ignoring the above statement. Does one have to be black and oppressed to have the capacity to understand the meaning?
lol...I've seen my share, and it's beneath me to explain them in an effort to validate my struggles..I'd find this laughable if it wasn't so demeaning, yet it's not on me to explain myself. People are more oppressed than me, and are owed defending..My history makes me understand that, and that's really all that matters..As a 22 year old living in New Hampshire, please try to explain (given my limited capacity for understanding) your current oppression?
BTW: Tyflier is basically right on point here...Loving it!.