I understand that, but it has gotten to the point where almost every individual snake is getting its own morph name. No offense to whoever started calling that slightly different look by a new name, but it isn't a new.
If a motley could be reliably reproduced with 3+ Q-tip shapes on it and went by a unique name, it wouldn't bother me that much. However, I'm seeing oneswith a single shape like that going by a supposedly new name. That's just a little, um, extreme, don't you think?
Q-tip, banded, hurricane, etc. are all MOTLEY CORNS. It might describe the LOOK of a motley, but, in my opinion, are in no way "new morph names." Cubed motley was ORIGINALLY the same thing as a sunspot motley. Now, cubed just is used to try and tack a new name on "bad" stripe corns that aren't that unusual. I actually bought alot of cubed corns to start working with them, but I've lost interest. Only about 2 or 3 of the dozens and dozens of posts I've seen had what I wouldconsider a valid "cubed corn." Of these ones I've got, I wouldn't resale them as cubed corns, either. They just aren't extreme enough.
THAT'S the problem. Little differences do not (or at least SHOULD not) a new morph name make. If the images being posted now of cubed corns are what people mean TODAY by "cubed," then they are nothing special at all - just "bad" stripes that have ALWAYS been produced. That is upsetting, and a direction away from the original use of that term.
Even cubed motley is also being used to descrinbe "banded" motleys now. Grrrrr!