desertanimal
2003 UB313
homegrownherps said:Well I guess if I don't go w/ the flow , its called arguing !
( I knew there was reason why I don't frequent the forums )
No , I don't think you see what I am looking for , what I want is blkkat to provide me with the info that made her so confident on the statement she made. I don't want YOU to provide me with the info.
She was so confident in her statements that I thought she would have some facts to back it up. And not have some one else provide documentation.
oh well ...maybe another time.
I'll drop it here because I don't appreciate it when I try to have a discussion and get accused of "arguing". And I think she just made a statement and has nothing to back it up.
Well, I never said arguing was a bad thing. I said I couldn't help you with arguing. I, myself, am prone to arguing, and sometimes quite enjoy it. In fact, I would argue that that's what I'm doing right now--arguing. I just don't think arguing is a terrible thing to be avoided. I do it at parties wiht my best friends. I feel passionately about logic and reasonable actions, and I will argue a position at the proverbial drop of a hat. I don't take my balls home when someone calls it arguing, because a spade's a spade, after all. I keep throwing my balls just as hard as I can until I've won or lost or given up. I think this metaphor might be heading in directions I don't want it to, and so I shall abandon it . . .
But let me restate what I think you've said here, to be sure I'm clear. Are you saying that you are NOT actually interested in taking a look at the data that may pertain to whether or not TSD occurs in cornsnakes and are ONLY interested in having blkkat back up her statements? I believe that's how the above reads.
I assumed that you were actually interested in knowing more about the topic at hand and I guessed that you were ALSO interested in arguing with blkkat. I may have been incorrect; according to your last post you are only interested in the latter. I made no judgements in my post about the rectitude of either pursuit, but recognized explicitly that in this case, the two are fundamentally different lines of investigation and require different courses of action. One, I can help with, the other, I cannot. I can't get blkkat to cough up references any more easily than you.
I simply coughed up one to help with the first issue, and bowed out on the second.
I'm sorry you took umbrage at my apparently accusatory post. If it makes you feel any better, just think of it as discussion and going against the flow.