• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Unusual corn ( Identify please )

Joe, I agree for the most part but the knife cuts both ways. If there is no proof that they are pure, then there is no proof that they aren't pure.

I was told at one point (from a very reputable breeder) that before there was a market for corn babies that most were released into the wild, including the fabled "hunt club" area.

My point being, if you can't prove purity in any way then even hunt club snakes should be suspect.

There is absolutely no way for the purists view (right or wrong) to be maintained. Attempts can be made to the best of thier ability but proof, well there is none. Even locality isn't proof.
 
Vinman said:
that snake is corn snake crossed to a Obsoleta 100 % I seen many, they have the same blothches and the low blotch count. Look at the head shape. THere is no question to what that snake is the rat snake that was used is either a yellow or everglades. I would have to say everglades if I had to pick one. The fact that hatchling everglades are very light and will show color before a yellow does. it also can be a yellow X everglades crossed to a corn

There is no foundation to this claim Vinny. How many people cross corns to rats to get the frosted look?? Do any of those have a lower saddle count?? I've yet to see ANY snake that can be identified as a 100% honest-to-god, can pick it out of the crowd hybrid. There has to be some proof or backing to all statements. I have noticed that lately, any corn that doesn't follow someone's picture of the ideal specimine in their heads, is automatically a hybrid. Could this be a hybrid?? Yes, all snakes have that possibility. Could this just be a different look to a corn?? Possibly, people are constantly breeding for certain looks they find desireable. For all we know, this could be a milk snake phase taken to an extreme to the point that it no longer looks that way. My suggestion for the mexican rat snake was a little ambiguous, I'll admit. The mexican rat that I was suggesting is Pantherophis guttatus meahllmorum, a suggested, but not widely accepted, subspecies to emoryis/corns. Their range is supposedly in the southwestern-most part of the emoryi range, going from roughly mid texas south to the northern portions of mexico. I did my research, and I even put them on my site because I thought it was worth noting. They also are supposed to have a reduction of ventral checkers, especially around the chin/neck area. IF this holds true to the origional snake posted, then I would have to stand by my suggestion that is might be one of those "extreme south-western emoryis" which I am currently calling the mexican rat snake, Pantherophis guttatus meahllmorum. Here's the link to my page where I placed this snake BTW, that way, no one can claim I'm full of crap. http://www.freewebs.com/mfserp/Morph-SubSpecies.htm
 
Joe Thank you I been saying thisalong and it was theultra post that I got into it if you remember This where Me and serp went to war now that all the smoke cleared yoyu can say that I'm was right that most people ard not responsible enuff tho have hybirds. I havethem for years Do you know how long I been looking for a fem for my mexicna intergrade X gray band X corn. I could berrd yearsago but I cant find the right fem.
 
Vinman said:
Ecreipeoj Thank you I been saying this all a long and it was the ultra post that I got into it if you remember This where Me and serp went to war now that all the smoke cleared you can say that I'm was right that most people ard not responsible enuff tho have hybirds. I have them for years Do you know how long I been looking for a fem for my mexicna intergrade X gray band X corn. I could berrd yearsago but I cant find the right fem.
I dont want them to look like a pure breed.
 
noe to get back on topic this snake has too red of blotches to be a ratsnake the fact that it looks like a rat snake head . I have seen many corns crossed with everglades ,yellow gray ,anr black rat , I can tell tou that if it was crossed with a blackrat it color would not be that clean, grayrat would look like a miami phase with that weird pattren. so the only thing that it could be is a yellow or everglaids rat crossed to a corn. This is a no brainer just one look and you can tell that it is a ratsnake/ corn cross
 
Vin, when you sell the snakes from this
my mexicna intergrade X gray band X corn.
you lose control over who does what with them. Even if you purposely try not to make them look like corns, there's no way to control what others do when you sell them. Unless you keep or destroy everything from this project, you are assisting the degradation of the purity of the corn snake.
 
Vinman said:
Joe Thank you I been saying thisalong and it was theultra post that I got into it if you remember This where Me and serp went to war now that all the smoke cleared yoyu can say that I'm was right that most people ard not responsible enuff tho have hybirds.
Vin,
I am not in your corner. I disagree with almost everything that you post on this forum. Many of the things that you say have some truth to them, but the way that you put them and your thought process is like reading a foreign language.

In fact, when I see that you have made a post on a thread on this forum, I avoid reading them, because each and every one of them end up sounding like an arrogant kindergartner arguing over a toy.
 
For the record, I did not say that ultras are or are not hybrids. I said I don't care. I was not "wrong" to say I do not care. I was 100% correct, because I, in fact, do not care.

There is nothing virtuous or superior about (to pretend that there even is such a thing) a "pure" corn. Nor is there something intrinsically inferior about a "hybrid."

The cold unfeeling fact of the matter is that hybridization will expand the pool of genes from which breeders will select what they like. They will then create a large array of different morphs and specimens, which will be more likely (because there's more to choose from) to appeal to their own tastes and the tastes of others.

That isn't a value judgement about hybridization, it is a cold hard fact.

A value judgement is whether or not the above reality is "a good thing" or "a bad thing" and is entirely a matter of personal opinion for each individual. Some people seem to think that it (reality) is the end of the world. That's their problem. It still does not make their opinion a fact, nor does it make their opinion worth any more than anyone else's opinions.
 
I like and agree with your post Serp, tried to give you good rep points for it, but it says I must spread the love around more before I give more to you. hahaha.
 
ecreipeoj said:
Vin,
I am not in your corner. I disagree with almost everything that you post on this forum. Many of the things that you say have some truth to them, but the way that you put them and your thought process is like reading a foreign language.

In fact, when I see that you have made a post on a thread on this forum, I avoid reading them, because each and every one of them end up sounding like an arrogant kindergartner arguing over a toy.
all I saying is that I was right about the hybirds contamiating the gene pool now joe you constantly changing sides to wich ever side has more people. In the ultra post you say in post that it is a hybird and not a true corn in anothre post you say who cares if it is a hybird and you started all the contervirsy . any lie like when you say you got your okeetees of me that is BS and you never responed to me calling you out about it
 
What is with you dude? You need a hobby or something constructive to do with your time. Maybe you should try cornsnakes I hear they are fun to keep. Anyway best of luck in occupying your time. You should have plenty of it when you get put on "Global Ignore" and have burned all your bridges.
Josh :flames:
 
Clint Boyer said:
Vin, when you sell the snakes from this you lose control over who does what with them. Even if you purposely try not to make them look like corns, there's no way to control what others do when you sell them. Unless you keep or destroy everything from this project, you are assisting the degradation of the purity of the corn snake.

But Clint, you lose control over who does what with anything you sell. If you sell a "pure" corn snake to someone who ends up breeding it to a king snake (for example) and sells the hybrid offspring...does that mean that you now have assisted the degradation of the "purity" of the corn snake because you originally sold that person an animal? I don't think people should have to refrain from breeding and selling what they like over fear of what buyers may or may not do with the offspring down the road. (except for anything potentially dangerous - that's a whole differnent ball game IMO). Again, I come back to a comparison with the AKC for dogs (sorry!) - responsible breeders who are concerned about what happens to the puppies they produce thoroughly screen every buyer. They turn people away if they end up not being the type of owner they want for their puppies. If a puppy is not breeding quality they make the new owners sign a spay/neuter contract so the puppy won't be bred down the road. Are there any corn snake breeders out there who are prepared to make that same kind of effort to ensure the "purity" of the captive bred corn snake? Probably not.
 
Clint Boyer said:
Vin, when you sell the snakes from this you lose control over who does what with them. Even if you purposely try not to make them look like corns, there's no way to control what others do when you sell them. Unless you keep or destroy everything from this project, you are assisting the degradation of the purity of the corn snake.

you are rite clint It is a hard disscion to make should I breed him or not If I do I will be sellin g to the right peoplr I was thinking of castrate the males and cull the fem.
 
Traci1 said:
But Clint, you lose control over who does what with anything you sell. If you sell a "pure" corn snake to someone who ends up breeding it to a king snake (for example) and sells the hybrid offspring...does that mean that you now have assisted the degradation of the "purity" of the corn snake because you originally sold that person an animal? I don't think people should have to refrain from breeding and selling what they like over fear of what buyers may or may not do with the offspring down the road. (except for anything potentially dangerous - that's a whole differnent ball game IMO). Again, I come back to a comparison with the AKC for dogs (sorry!) - responsible breeders who are concerned about what happens to the puppies they produce thoroughly screen every buyer. They turn people away if they end up not being the type of owner they want for their puppies. If a puppy is not breeding quality they make the new owners sign a spay/neuter contract so the puppy won't be bred down the road. Are there any corn snake breeders out there who are prepared to make that same kind of effort to ensure the "purity" of the captive bred corn snake? Probably not.

Unfortuanetly, that is a flawed system. Inevitably, you have to rely on the new owner to keep up their end of the bargin. If you start turning away people because they aren't good enough for your snakes, word will get out and you may not sell a snake again, or you will really have a hard time in doing so. These things are real concerns when Jhonny-down-the-block can produce the same snakes you can, but is willing to sell them to anyone, and for a cheaper price. It's not as easy as going to an AKC system.
 
Traci,
I won't be held responsible for anything anyone does with anything I sell them. But I am responsible for what I sell them.
 
Vinman said:
you are rite clint It is a hard disscion to make should I breed him or not If I do I will be sellin g to the right peoplr I was thinking of castrate the males and cull the fem.

There is no hard decsion there. You breed the snake and then you lable and sell it as a hybrid. After that, it's out of your hands. There is no deciding if there are right or wrong people to sell to. Someone that you find as a "wrong" person will pass someone else's test. That is something that you cannot controll, nor is it a reasonable thing to think about.
 
There is no deciding if there are right or wrong people to sell to.

This is not the issue.
The issue is whether or not you should sell hybrids according to your own philosophy. If you fear for contamination in corn lines, don't do it.
 
Clint Boyer said:
Joe, I agree for the most part but the knife cuts both ways. If there is no proof that they are pure, then there is no proof that they aren't pure.

I was told at one point (from a very reputable breeder) that before there was a market for corn babies that most were released into the wild, including the fabled "hunt club" area.

My point being, if you can't prove purity in any way then even hunt club snakes should be suspect.

There is absolutely no way for the purists view (right or wrong) to be maintained. Attempts can be made to the best of thier ability but proof, well there is none. Even locality isn't proof.
I can certainly see your point.

I think the idea of what constitutes a “Pure” Corn is different to many groups of people. We base a lot of our opinions on taxonomy studies that establish our subspecies. Many studies are done to get a name for themselves and eventually are changed by somebody else. It seems as if our Elaphe guttata guttata is no more and has been replaced by a new paper which as been accepted by those who make these types of decisions. I can not tell you how many subspecies names have been changed since I have been in this hobby. If they can be changed so easily, perhaps the study that established them in the first place was flawed. Intergrades is a gray area, that would be considered a hybrid if done in captivity.

A wild caught snake is a wild snake, that has been bred in the wild and its “Breeder” is “Mother Nature”. As soon as we take these wild snakes into captivity and we become the breeder, they are being manipulated by different factors and in time, they are not exactly like their wild counter parts. Every year, I select which snakes will be paired and which snakes that I hold back for future breeders. My guidelines as a breeder are completely different than Mother Natures.

Captive bred snakes should not be released into the wild in my opinion, but more importantly, in the opinions of scientist, who may have a voice in legislation that controls our ability to legally keep reptiles of any kind in captivity. It would be very easy for someone in a position to make recommendations to a legislative body, to use the release of captive bred snakes into the wild as a reason for us to not have them at all.

There are many types of proof. Statements are accepted as proof. These statements have to be weight as to their credibility. Statements can be about what people have done themselves, what they have witnessed and even what they have been told. Certain facts can be considered as proof. There are hundreds of threads on this forum that can be offered as proof of the obvious avenues of hybrid blood being introduced into the captive population of Corns. Every Snake Show that I have ever been to, has tons of proof, that this is occurring on a very regular basis. I have seen and know of many people that will sell a Creamcicle that looks like an Amel as an Amel. I have seen Wholesalers mix Creamcicles and Amels together and sell them as Amels to Pet Stores. The same exact thing happens with Hybrids and Normals.

The Ultra line has a lot of proof, but it came out at a time when people had already accepted that they were pure and invested a great deal of time into projects created with them. The Gray Rat Hybrid issue is not a new one. This has been a constant companion with this line for many years. Andy Barr bred a great deal of Hybrids. He sold most of them as hybrids, but also sold many of them as pure and it was later found out that they were actually hybrids. One of our most honored members, was sold Pure Corns purchased from Andy that were not pure at all. There are many Ultramels, Ultra Ghost and Ultramel Ghost that can be traced back to Barr and his hybrid line that contains the Ultra gene. A great deal of them, actually most of them, have been bred into our captive population of Corns from coast to coast. Some people try to say that theirs may not be a part of Barr’s Hybrid Ultra line, but how can anybody tell a pure Ultra from a Hybrid Ultra several generations later. They can not. The same is true with all other morphs of Corns so they get mixed together.

Just because a Corn is not sold as a hybrid is no proof that it is pure. You have to look at the entire pie and when you put all of the proof together it points very sharply at a great deal of hybrid blood in our captive population of Corns. I have never personally contributed to this, but I know that this is the status of our captive population and I accept it, and like Serp, I don‘t care. It is totally beyond our control. We are in no way trying to duplicate Mother Natures breeding goals. We can only work with what we have.

If you put a teaspoon of Indian Ink in a swimming pool, it will disappear in a short time, but it is still there. I see very strong proof, that many teaspoons of ink are being put into the pool all of the time, and it can be seen for awhile, but it also soon disappears. There is a lot of proof, it just depends on which proof some people select to accept and which they select to be false to help support what they want to be true.
 
ecreipeoj very well put. Now even though I 'm a purest we have to look at one thing .ooh crap I hate to say this but it is true, look Obeselatta / corn hybirds have been found in nature . The fact Is that I'm sure if you hunt in the range were corns and grayrats live together you are gona find some grayrat/corn crosses and who will they breed with corn or obesletta ?
if it happend in nature and the hybird mateted with a corn then you would not be able to tell it from a pure corn by the third gen . ther for the ultra gene would have been so called pure corn stock. Nobody would known the diffrance.
 
Back
Top