Is kistanie the same as copper? I haven't seen them offered for sale.
Just found this thread today. If anyone sees a thread they think I might want to play on, please PM it to me. Thanks.
Are Kastanie & Copper the same?
Please take anything I post here with a big side helping of speculation.
I sent a pic of my Copper to Don and he replied that he is visually the same as his Kastanie's.
My Kastanie is 100% het amel, from Frank in Germany. He is lighter than the Copper male. Being het for amel shouldn't cause a classic to change color, but in the instance of Kastanie, it appears to. Please keep in mind I have only 1.1 adult Copper & 1.0 adult Kastanie. Is 3 individuals enough to make a broad statement about both lineages over? No.
This year I bred Copper X Xanthic Snow. The offspring are all wild-type classics, they are not lighter in color as I would have expected them to be, they are visually darker than the Kastanie het amel.
There are differences in the belly checkers. But I recall a thread on Tess where Don posted pics of belly checkers on a broad assortment of Tess babies. And there was a lot of variation. Then I looked at the belly checkers on the original female Tess here from Graham, and gee whiz, she has NO belly checkers. So I'm tossing out the belly checker is a sign of anything consideration. Sure, belly checkers can be helpful for Masque, Diffused, Motley, maybe a couple other critters, but is not applicable to Ka/Cop.
Kastanie turned up in a c/b European collection;
Copper originates from wild-caught locality stock.
They look very similar.
A lot of amels look very similar.
Okees look like Okees, but from what I can gather, there seem to be different versions of those, too, which each play a different result when out-crossed to other morphs/genes/traits/localities &c.
Breeding Ka X Cop is kind of like breeding Buf X Toffee. You'll likely get offspring which could pass for either parent. But does this mean they are the same thing?
If one thinks of locality types as a line-bred-morph,
even though they were not line-bred in captivity...
and the F1's from out-crossing are around 50% visually very similar to the locality-type, then one is seeing the F-1 affect of the line bred genetic lineage.
50% of the parents were a line-bred locality-type, so the 50% visuals of the clutch makes sense. Visual F1's is the effect of the line-bred/locality gene/trait. This should not be confused with co-dominance.
With Copper X Kastanie, perhaps there are similarly behaving genes or traits in play, but personally I am not convinced they are the same thing.