Dean-
I didn't make the moderation comment because I doubt you or the other mods. On the contrary, I want to make this as easy for the 3 of you as possible, and I only thought that if, by chance, you 3 didn't WANT to moderate that forum...it might be easier. What I mean is...I rarely see Mike or Susan involved in the more political discussions. There is nothing wrong with that, of course, but, unless they are "called in" by a reported post...I rarely see them comment. I was merely thinking of their right to NOT be involved in such a forum should they choose that. I only thought that a new moderator team specifically FOR the new forum would be more ready and accepting of the position. Afterall...this wasn't a concern when the 3 of you accepted your positions, and I don't think that it should be "forced" on you any more than the discussions should be "forced" on anyone else.
If there was a 2 person team dedicated to keeping order in the adult OT forum, you three would never have to worry about reading something you didn't want to read. Likewise...it would limit personal feelings in making decisions
about the topics in there. It seems only reasonable that if Mike or Susan have no desire to participate in anything in that forum, they might react more strongly than someone that has the
desire to be there...and very rightfully so. If they(or you) are forced into a situation they deem unacceptable on a personal level, it may be more difficult to moderate fairly on a public level.
The three of you have a right to choose your level of participation just as any of the rest of us do. I just didn't think it would be fair to force a new chapter into your collective novel. Perhaps I am overthinking the situation in that respect, but...:shrugs:...it only seems fair to both you 3, as the fantastic team you make, and the participants. Just my $.02...
As regards your other concerns...I don't really think there is anyone on this forum that would be accepting of graphic, pornographic, obscene, or violent content in ANY forum. Personally, I doubt that there is anyone that would enjoy seeing pictures of *every* piercing on a person's body. I don't think anyone WANTS to read a long, drawn out, Penthouse Forum reply about someone's most recent adventures with their spouse...at least not here, and not in a public forum. This is why I made the statement earlier that using the term "Adult Forum" was not meant, at least by me, to imply anything pornographic or sexual in nature.
What I mean is...I truly think that the majority of people advocating for a new forum are people that genuinely CARE about the forum as a whole, and do not wish to see it turned into a brothel of words, no matter what forum they are reading. "We" merely want a place to have more lively discussion about current events, political debates, religious discussions, human rights(in all areas), and the other controversial topics that abound, without "forcing" other people to participate. A place where a discussion between right-wing and left-wing fundamentalists can be conducted without developing into a 50 page discussion about whether or not it belongs on a
cornsnake forum. A place where desertanimal can post her shoutout on Coming Out Day without worrying about how the majority of the general population *might* react to it. A place where someone can vent about a bad day, and use "implied profanity" without offending the sensibilities of the general membership. I don't think anyone wants to open a thread and read about Dale's encounters with his latest redhead...at least not here at CS.com...

. I don't think anyone wants to open a topic and see pictures of my piercings...at least, I hope not...

.
Don't get me wrong...I fully understand your concern. And I appreciate the concerns of others who simply think it is unnecessary, and that such discussions should be left off the board entirely. As far as your concern...I don't think it will be the "free-for-all nightmare" that you are envisioning. For the other concerns...I respectfully disagree, and would appreciate a place to hold these discussions, without "forcing" them on those individuals.
Much like Dale...I prefer to think positively about our general membership, and the individuals interested in a new forum. I
highly respect 98% or more of the membership here, and I am very interested in having these sorts of discussions, on a respectful level, with them. On the flip side of that coin, I also
highly respect those members that do not want to participate, and would prefer to acknowledge that by having these discussions in a forum where they simply do not have to worry about "surprise topics".
But again...just one person's opinion...FWIW...