starsevol said:
Also is there a visual difference between ....
A Pewter that is charcoal + bloodred vs a pewter that is charcoal + diffused
A Granite that is anery + bloodred vs anery + diffused
A hypo lav blood vs a hypo lav diffuse
Also what happens if you breed a diffused and a bloodred?
If you switch "bloodred" for "reverse okeetee" and switch "diffused" with "amel" you get the same results. Some normals het amel will throw reverse okeetee offspring. But they're
"normals het for amel that are capable of throwing reverse okeetees" as opposed to
"normals het for reverse okeetee."
I think the selection part of bloodreds is for an extreme-ness of pattern, and thin-ness of bordering. The deepness of the reds on the ground color also seems to be controlled by selection.
We did a few interesting crosses this year. They involved the male bloodred in the comparison pic, and his bloodred sister, as well as offspring of the diffused example in the comparison pic.
We crossed charcoal from diffused to a bloodred and got the type of mixing you'd expect between the two. They were an improvement over the diffused parent but not quite as good as the bloodred parent.
Here's a comparison of hypo pewter from bloodred X bloodred, versus hypo pewter from charcoal X charcoal (Where both charcoals are the product of the diffused female X a non-bloodred/diffused snake.)
From bloodred:
http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showpost.php?p=252962&postcount=303 (Check out the second pic)
From diffused:
http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36225
Also of interest... when I breed the diffused female to make normals het diffusion, the offspring all look very much like normals. (Your trio for example.) This year I outcrossed the bloodred male to a motley female, and the offspring are almost completely borderless and it's very obvious they came from a bloodred, they look like what everyone expects from hets.
(Which brings up the question of how much of the "het-look" is really just selection versus the diffusion gene itself. :grin01: )