• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Nine teens charged with bullying in teen's suicide

When I was a kid I lived in a suburban neighborhood. I lived at the far southern end of block A, and Bobby Hogan lived two houses from the end of block B. After block B was a shopping center- and those were the days when kids could come and go as they pleased, ride their bikes or walk anywhere within a couple mile radius, without fear. Except of Bobby Hogan. Nearly everywhere I wanted to go required cutting through his territory. My entire elementary school career was clouded by an intense fear of this boy, a year younger than me. I (and my friends) had to always be on the lookout for him. Assorted other boys would join in his pack to pick on weaker kids, but he was always the kingpin. Even walking home from school was not safe. We never thought of tattling on him, though, to an adult. Mostly what he would do is chase us until we could reach a safe haven. Or throw rocks, snowballs, lie in wait to spring out and terrorize us, whip us with raspberry vines, push us down. IN school, though, a bully would have been physically reprimanded by the principle, teacher, or parent, maybe all three! It just plain wasn't tolerated. I don't feel like it improved my character one bit to have had to live in fear for so many years of my childhood.
 
You did say that if there wasn't physical abuse then the bullies should not be criminally charged. And bullying/harassment are criminal behaviors even "just" the verbal kinds. So if you do not want to be perceived as defending criminal behavior, then stop defending criminal behavior. Abuse and harassment are criminal behaviors even if there is no physical contact.
If there was no physical assault, there is no reason to drag these other kids through a criminal trial. Let the school handle bullying until it becomes an assault. That's NOT defending criminal activity, no matter how you might like it to be. That's defending young, dumb kids from suffering a permanent record based on a teenage mistake.

The FACT is...we don;t know what these 9 kids actually DID to deserve these criminal charges. period. We don;t know what they did, we don;'t know what this poor girl was suffering through besides bullying...we don;t know ANYTHING!!

So...let's just criminalize everyone that is mean. That's a great way to do things. yea...that's more sarcasm...

You can have sarcasm font all you want but yes kids who regularly abuse and bully other kids should be stopped and if it is not remedied by punishment in the beginning and it turns into something more than an isolated incident, then it is a crime.[/quote]
I agree 100%. It SHOULD be punished. I've said it in almost every post I;'ve made. BULLYING SHOULD BE PUNISHED!!! But bullying is not always a crime, and it doesn't always need to end up in criminal prosecution. Period.

There is simply not NEAR enough information in the articles to determine if these other kids are actually guilty of any crime, and here you and others sit screaming for their blood. I find that ridiculous.


If you think I assume the worst about the bullies then you are wrong read my first post in this thread I spent 5 paragraphs talking about how much blame there is to go around and talking about what everyone could have done. While I do most certainly believe that you have to be accountable for your own actions, I believe that if the grown up in this situation had been doing their jobs the bullying would have never made it to a point this severe. But if the kids parents are not going to teach them how to behave in society and if the school cannot or wont then someone does have to teach them that this is not ok so SADLY it falls to law enforcement. I have said several times that when it first starts or at least when adults first hear about it that is when punishments and strategies need to be put into place to keep an insult from turning in to a reoccurring bullying situation.
Well, heck...go back and read all of my posts, while you're at it. I made MANY mentions that criminal activity should be punished in accordance with the law. I made MANY mentions that bullying in schools is wrong and should be punished by the schools. I made many mentions that parents and administrators need to take responsibility. You have a lot to say for someone that evidently didn't read what I wrote...

I am not going to waste a bunch of space arguing semantics regarding where bullying starts, the definition has been posted already. AN insult is different from repeated insults and verbal assaults day in and day out. I actually can read just fine and I personally found the definition to be quite clear.
But...we ARE arguing semantics. You say all bullying is abuse. I say it it is not. A line needs to be drawn as to where "normal taunting" ends and "abuse" begins. If you aren't interested in figuring out where that line is and when these 9 kids crossed it, than you've no business accusing them of doing anything intentionally criminal. Without deciding WHEN it becomes criminal, you can't decide IF it is criminal. And since neither one of us even knows what these kids DID...it's a fairly ludicrous argument...

Questioning a persons ability to read, because you are in a debate with them is mean and it is a insulting,.
Well...when your responses clearly show that you either did not read what was written or you did not comprehend what was written, it is more of an observation of fact than an insult,. But again...if you are so sensitive that me telling you to actually read what I wrote is considered "offensive and insulting", than I completely understand why you think all bullying is criminal. You're...too...sensitive.

No I do not think that makes you a criminal, while I did bring it to your attention because I do think it is wrong, I have never asked you to stop it and in terms of how you treat me this is a very isolated occurrence. Now if you were to continue to harass me and insult me day in and day out, then that might be a different story
Now I'm harassing you by replying to your posts that are specifically directed to me? You really do have a warped sense of harrassment and the legal use of the term "abuse".

I am a sensitive person but it is not up to you or to anyone else to decide for me how sensitive I should be.
You're absolutely right, it is not up to me. And it is not up to me to walk on eggshells in an effort to protect your sensibilities, either.

I get to decide who I am as a person whether you like it or not. I personally LOVE being sensitive, I am always the first person to notice when birds sing, I am the first person to notice when the spring flowers bloom, I am the first person to notice when a friend of mine looks or acts upset all because I am sensitive. You can say "too sensitive" like its a bad thing, but actually being sensitive is an absolutely WONDERFUL thing, that I do not plan to change any time soon....so get used to it or ignore me, that would be your choice.
Than...it shouldn't offend you that I called you "too sensitive". If you think it is such a wonderful thing to wear your heart on your sleeve, and expose yourself to heartache because someone eslse is less sensitive, that's your choice. But don't expect me to walk around trying to protect you from your own sensitivities. That's not my job.

I do not want to criminalize a school yard bully, I want for parents and teachers to put a stop to incidents right away so that an insult never develops into a case of full fledged bullying, but if a person does still continue harassing people and does continue to be abusive despite efforts to stop them, then yes they are behaving criminally and they should be stopped.
Well, see...we actually want the same things. And again...since we have no idea what these 9 kids actually did...well...no need to repeat myself again. If you didn't get it the first 15 times I said it, you never will.

I think it is terrible that you consider the world to be "not a nice place." I love my world. Almost all of the time the people I come in contact with are pleasant and kind. My world is almost always a lovely place. I guess it all depends on how you look at things.
It's not what I think...it's what it is. I think it's great that you get to live in a place where everything is always roses and everyone is always "super sweet". That's wonderful. But that's not "the real world". The real world is a harsh, mean, and dangerous place...with or without bullies.

It is not criminal to be mean that is true. If a person asks you for directions it is legal for you to tell them to take a hike, you do not have to be nice and give them directions. But being mean is different from being a bully.
At what point is being mean different than being a bully? Here you go again with arguing semantics when you don't want to "waste space arguing semantics". You don't want to argue about where the line should be drawn, but you are clearly drawing a line that you expect every other individual to agree with.

So tell me...where is that line, and what information in those articles tells you that these kids definitely crossed that line?

Don't bother looking...they don't tell you what these kids actually did...only what they are charged with. And in THIS country, a person is innocent until proven guilty. At least that's the way it was the last time I checked...
 
I agree. I have gotten the impression that Chris is advocating for recognizing the difference between ordinary schoolyard "stuff", which is wrong but not worthy of criminal records, and more severe bad behavior. I have also gotten the impression he is saying that bullying alone would be unlikely to drive a child to suicide unless the child had other problems, like mental health issues. I am not sure he is right, but he makes a valid point. Several people here have posted about severe bullying, stalking, & abuse they experienced, but they are still alive. There may well be some underlying issues that tip the balance causing one child to hang on, albeit with emotional and/or physical scars, and another child to commit suicide. Chris also made a point that I think is REALLY GOOD -- the ADULTS failed the girl in South Hadley. And they did.

So can we all simmer down please?

Thank you. VERY much, for actually reading what I wrote and comprehending the words I used. This is precisely the point that I am making.

And again...the truth of the matter is that there is NOTHING in those articles that tells us what these kids did that made their behavior worthy of criminal repercussions, rather than punishment delivered by the school.
 
The American Psychological Association lists suicidal thoughts as one of the psychological effects of being Bullied.

http://www.apa.org/about/gr/issues/cyf/bullying-briefing.aspx

You're right. Depression and mental anguish IS a result of being bullied. Suicide is not a direct result of being bullied. If it were, we wouldn't have the population troubles we are experiencing globally, because half the kids that go to school would commit suicide before graduation.

Happy, healthy, well-adjusted children with a solid support system do not take their own life because they are being bullied. They get angry, depressed, sad, cry, and throw tantrums. And the people around them recognize these signs of trouble, and do everything they can to help that child deal with their issues.

Sure, there are people that are so unbalanced that the simple act of bullying, without criminal activity, can lead them to suicide. Heck, some people are so sensitive that they have taken their own life over the loss of a boy/girlfriend. But this is not "normal".

There are usually underlying causes, besides the "reason given", that accumulate and build up within an individual, until they feel they can't take anymore. It is rarely a single act or situation that causes a normal teen to take their own life. It might happen, but it is NOT the normal thing...
 
I just skimmed over the last few pages of this, but it makes me sad that I know very few people around my age that could carry on a conversation or discussion like you guys are. :awcrap:
 
Chris, your argument is so entirely ignorant and childish, I hope Dinah doesn't respond. I tried to respond to what you just wrote but I found BS and exaggeration and twisted words in every line. Talking to you is like talking to child. There is just no point in it.
 
Chris, your argument is so entirely ignorant and childish, I hope Dinah doesn't respond. I tried to respond to what you just wrote but I found BS and exaggeration and twisted words in every line. Talking to you is like talking to child. There is just no point in it.

What have I twisted? What is so ignorant about my posts? Please tell me.

I just read your story about you and your son and his friend and that is just horrible. And I agree with every word you wrote, believe it or not.

But that's the point...people in this topic are criminalizing kids without knowing what, specifically, these kids did. No one EVER knows why a person, especially a child would take their own life.

To blame 9 kids and say they deserve criminal records without even knowing what, specifically, they did is just...plain...wrong.

You can hate me all you want, dude. But I'm not the one that is twisting things around...
 
I'm not going to continue Chris. I'm worn out with this topic. I think it is the police who have blamed the 9 kids and believe they deserve criminal records, and the police are the ones who actually know what happened. It's the people here who are making assumptions and casting blame with out knowing all the facts.
 
If there was no physical assault, there is no reason to drag these other kids through a criminal trial. Let the school handle bullying until it becomes an assault. That's NOT defending criminal activity, no matter how you might like it to be. That's defending young, dumb kids from suffering a permanent record based on a teenage mistake.

Q: Are juvenile records expunged?

* A: Most states have laws that allow, or possibly even require, the expungement of juvenile records once the juvenile reaches a certain age. In some cases, the records are destroyed; sometimes they are simply "sealed." Also, in many states, juvenile records are sealed automatically and immediately. The purpose of these laws is to allow a minor who has committed criminal acts, or in the language of the juvenile courts, "delinquent acts," to erase his record permanently, usually at the age of 17 or 18. The idea is to allow the juvenile offender to enter adulthood with a "clean slate," shielding him from the negative effects of having a criminal record.

Be sure to check the laws in your state or talk to an attorney for details on expunging or sealing juvenile records in your state.

Hmm... :rolleyes:
 
I've not read the whole "discussion" here, but just want to say that it is so very SAD that she felt that alone and isolated that her only option - in her mind - was to end her life. I deal with young people on a DAILY basis... I'm a "professional" houseparent... it's my job and I take it seriously.

There have been a few times when one of my "charges" has come home crying because of bullying in the school. The VERY NEXT DAY, whether the child wanted me to or not, I was at the school talking it over with the vice-principal or principal to resolve the issue. I've got no tolerance for it. I probably have a little more "clout" than your typical parent at the school because I don't only represent myself, but the Children's Home I work with, but I think a persistent and resolute parent could probably do the same thing. I follow up such visits with repeated discussions with the child and the school officials until the issue is completely resolved.

ONE thing had me very disheartened though... I did go to bat for one of my girls just as I mentioned above. Everything got taken care of and she was "safe" from those who bullied her. Not 3 weeks later, SHE and her friends had one of the other girls in our house in the school bathroom bullying her. Boy, when I heard that, I went through the roof! She lost any privileges for WEEKS because of it... and/but the bullying stopped.

I do wish someone would have been able to go to bat for this young person before she took her own life.
 
If there was no physical assault, there is no reason to drag these other kids through a criminal trial. Let the school handle bullying until it becomes an assault. That's NOT defending criminal activity, no matter how you might like it to be. That's defending young, dumb kids from suffering a permanent record based on a teenage mistake.
The FACT is...we don;t know what these 9 kids actually DID to deserve these criminal charges. period. We don;t know what they did, we don;'t know what this poor girl was suffering through besides bullying...we don;t know ANYTHING!!



I've said it in almost every post I;'ve made. BULLYING SHOULD BE PUNISHED!!! But bullying is not always a crime, and it doesn't always need to end up in criminal prosecution. Period.
There is simply not NEAR enough information in the articles to determine if these other kids are actually guilty of any crime, and here you and others sit screaming for their blood. I find that ridiculous.





But...we ARE arguing semantics. You say all bullying is abuse. I say it it is not.

Well...when your responses clearly show that you either did not read what was written or you did not comprehend what was written, it is more of an observation of fact than an insult,. But again...if you are so sensitive that me telling you to actually read what I wrote is considered "offensive and insulting", than I completely understand why you think all bullying is criminal. You're...too...sensitive.



Now I'm harassing you by replying to your posts that are specifically directed to me? You really do have a warped sense of harrassment and the legal use of the term "abuse".



You're absolutely right, it is not up to me. And it is not up to me to walk on eggshells in an effort to protect your sensibilities, either.
Than...it shouldn't offend you that I called you "too sensitive". If you think it is such a wonderful thing to wear your heart on your sleeve, and expose yourself to heartache because someone eslse is less sensitive, that's your choice. But don't expect me to walk around trying to protect you from your own sensitivities. That's not my job.



It's not what I think...it's what it is. I think it's great that you get to live in a place where everything is always roses and everyone is always "super sweet". That's wonderful. But that's not "the real world". The real world is a harsh, mean, and dangerous place...with or without bullies.


At what point is being mean different than being a bully?

It is true we will never know exactly what there kids did to her, but here is some of the things they did

Since last fall

Prince suffered months of nearly constant stalking and harassment, the Associated Press reports.

The boston globe reports that
"They followed Phoebe around, calling her a slut. When they wanted to be more specific, they called her an Irish slut. The name-calling, the stalking, the intimidation was relentless."

" Phoebe was walking home from school when one of the Mean Girls drove by in a car. An insult and an energy drink can came flying out the car window in Phoebe’s direction."

"Instead, they went on Facebook and mocked her in death."

"From information known to investigators thus far, it appears that Phoebe's death on January 14th followed a tortuous day for her, in which she was subjected to verbal harassment and threatened physical abuse,'' Scheibel said.


Fox news
"The investigation revealed relentless activities directed toward Phoebe to make it impossible for her to stay at school. The bullying for her was intolerable," Scheibel said. (scheibel is the district attorney)

If you don't think they were harassing her then I guess that is your call to make, but I think that is harassment and harassment is criminal. No assault has to take place in order for a crime to have taken place. I agree it would have been GREAT is last fall when this started the school had stepped in and the parents had stepped in and they had together put a stop to this before it became a crime, but they didn't, and things escalated and these kids did harass her and that is against the law.


Bullying is Abuse and abuse and harassment are crimes. Just because you said it isn't a crime that doesn't make it so. I have already provided supporting evidence that says bullying is abuse. I say the sky is purple but that does not make it so.

Really screaming for their blood? Just because I do think that people who behave in a criminal manner should face criminal charges? It is up to a jury to decide if they are guilty or not and I am totally aware of innocent until proven guilty. I am not claiming they are guilty. But it is not outrageous for me to say that if they did break the law like they are charged with doing, then they do deserve to have criminal charges brought against them. That is not screaming for their blood.


You may be arguing semantics, but I am not. I said bullying was abuse and I provided a source, you said it is not and you backed that statement up with nothing. I have read the definition of bullying and the American Psychological associations writing about it and the Wikipedia page on it, and I have gone through a lot of bullying related training in my teaching classes, I have a clear understanding of the difference between a one time insult and a persistent targeted attack on another person. You are welcome to try to find someone to argue semantics with you but I decline to do so.


I did not say you were harassing me, in fact to quote you "If you had read what I wrote..." you would see that what I said was "Questioning a persons ability to read, because you are in a debate with them is mean and it is a insulting,. No I do not think that makes you a criminal, while I did bring it to your attention because I do think it is wrong, I have never asked you to stop it and in terms of how you treat me this is a very isolated occurrence. Now if you were to continue to harass me and insult me day in and day out, then that might be a different story" - SO unless you plan to insult me every day I imagine you are in the clear. SO to be clear I did not say you were harassing me, I said you were rude.


As for me being sensitive, you are way wrong if you think being sensitive means that people have to walk on eggshells around me, you are way wrong if you think it means I wear my heart on my sleeve and am easily offended. You are also completely wrong if you think being sensitive is a choice. Being sensitive has NEVER caused me heartache. I do not expect people to accommodate me and walk on eggshells as to not offend me. But I do expect people to behave politely not because I am sensitive but becasue all people deserve to be treated with respect. And good manners and politeness should be important to everyone even people who are not sensitive!


I live in the same real world that you do. I have bills to pay and places to go and things to do, all of that. The difference is not that I am somehow sheltered or that somehow my life is easier or less difficult, the reason that my "world" is lovely is because part of the way I live my life is to always be on the look out for the loveliness and to not dwell on the less lovely. Another reason that my life is always so rosy is because I work REAL hard to make sure it is. You reap what you sow, and I work hard to make sure I sow positive energy, polite behavior, and kindness. And in return that is how people treat me. Sure a man could walk in my wide open front door right now and hurt me but that doesn't mean that life is not lovely just because there is some danger in the world or just because bad things happen sometimes (well actually my family is armed so only if he was lucky could he make it over the threshold of my door, but that is a different story). In my lifetime I have been abused, I have an alcoholic father, and mentally unwell mother, I have been robbed and beaten by a stranger (now I carry pepper spray and once I finish my class I will be a proud new CC permit holder) and I have lost two homes due to natural disasters. This in addition to all the normal life stuff like how last year my husband lost his job. So don't you dare tell me that I don't what it's like to live in the real world. I think that having gone through these things still being able to feel like life is lovely is not a sign of weakness on my part but a sign of strength.

Mean - hateful: characterized by malice; "a hateful thing to do"; "in a mean mood"

Bullying - Deliberate action or behaviour directed towards another person which may take many forms and can often occur over a long period of time. Bullying is the use of any action that has the intent of causing pain and distress to the victim and can be either emotional, physical, racist, sexual, homophobic or verbal.

Abuse - mistreat: treat badly or maltreatment: cruel or inhumane treatment
harassment - the act of tormenting by continued persistent attacks and criticism
All the above definitions are taken from google

You're right. Depression and mental anguish IS a result of being bullied. Suicide is not a direct result of being bullied. If it were, we wouldn't have the population troubles we are experiencing globally, because half the kids that go to school would commit suicide before graduation.

Happy, healthy, well-adjusted children with a solid support system do not take their own life because they are being bullied. They get angry, depressed, sad, cry, and throw tantrums. And the people around them recognize these signs of trouble, and do everything they can to help that child deal with their issues.

Sure, there are people that are so unbalanced that the simple act of bullying, without criminal activity, can lead them to suicide. Heck, some people are so sensitive that they have taken their own life over the loss of a boy/girlfriend. But this is not "normal".

There are usually underlying causes, besides the "reason given", that accumulate and build up within an individual, until they feel they can't take anymore. It is rarely a single act or situation that causes a normal teen to take their own life. It might happen, but it is NOT the normal thing...

http://www.apa.org/about/gr/issues/cyf/bullying-briefing.aspx

Well since you apparently know more than the American Psychological Association maybe you can share with us where you got your information that in "normal" kids bullying doesn't cause suicide ever?
And while we are at it what exactly is a 'Normal" kid? I have meet a lot of kids in my life and not a single one has ever been "normal"
 
Then you come back and say we just don't have enough information to make those kind of judgement. Absolutely correct Sir. We do not have that kind of information. But the police do. The people making the charges do. So maybe they are in a better position to judge that you and I, do you think.

This is a good point. At this point, we don't know all the facts. I suspect the South Hadley PD & school system know more than we do. And the teenagers being charged do NOT at this point have a criminal record. And they won't, unless they are found guilty of something in a court of law. Even then, unless they are over 18, it will be a juvie record that will be sealed in the future.

So maybe we shouldn't flame on any more until we know what they are being charged with and what the DA is willing to say about evidence to support the charges. Or maybe we should wait until the whole thing makes its slow tortuous way thru the court system & we read about the verdicts.

In the meantime, hug your kids if you got 'em, and try to set a good example about meanness whether you are a parent or not!
 
Betsy, I'm sorry you live so far away, you seriously need a hug. I lost my temper, said some things I should not have. Chris has said that his purpose in life was to get under my skin. He wins this round. I don't think I'll play anymore. I deleted my post.

Nellie, you have blown me away with your clear headed thinking and eloquent presentation. You're a smart lady. I didn't know you were married, I feel a little cheated in that regard.
 
I didn't know you were married, I feel a little cheated in that regard.

Yep I am married it will be 8 years in May (yes I did get married at 20). I started dating my husband in high school actually so we have been together for a total of 11 years. Don't worry Wade he is a very nice guy (I would have never picked him otherwise - I don't put up with nonsense) you would totally approve of him!
 
I knew I would. I married my high school sweet heart too. About 12 years before you were born.
 
I'm not going to continue Chris. I'm worn out with this topic. I think it is the police who have blamed the 9 kids and believe they deserve criminal records, and the police are the ones who actually know what happened.
So...only guilty individuals ever get charged with a crime? There is no such thing as "Innocent until proven guilty" anymore? Nowadays we simply arrest kids, and condemn them publicly before we even know why they are being charged?

I sure am glad you don't make the laws...

It's the people here who are making assumptions and casting blame with out knowing all the facts.

I agree, 150%!! It's the people assuming that this girl had no other troubles other than the bullies. It's the people assuming that this girl had no underlying emotional or chemical dependancy problems. It's the people assuming that the police have made accurate charges, and that these kids are automatically guilty of these charges.

Your self-righteous crap is nauseating, wade, as per your normal public displays of superiority. Every single person in this topic has arrived at MASSIVELY assumptive conclusions with very little hard evidence to support ANY of it.

yet my suggestion that these 9 kids might not actually deserve to be criminally charged and that this young lady might have had other issues is what gets your panties twisted?

You can call me a "real jerk" as much as you want, wade, but at least I can read and comprehend English and don'tneed to resort to lying and twisting other people's words around to make a valid point like you do...regularly(except maybe the lying part...only caught you in the act of that one time...)
 

Hmmm what?? A little arrogant for proving absolutely nothing other than a practical understanding of Google, dontcha think?

In SOME states, for SOME charges, with SOME juveniles, yes, this is the case. However, in most states, this does not include corporal crimes...which statutry rape is classified as. So is assault...

And if these kids did actually cross the imaginary line between schoolyard taunting and harrassment or abuse, than they deserve charges.

But as of yet, we have no idea if these charges are deserved or not. Nobody on this forum knows what these kids actually did.

But let's go ahead and arrest them, charge them, and hell we here at CS.com have already convicted them, so we might as well get on with the execution, right?
 
You can call me a "real jerk" as much as you want, wade, but at least I can read and comprehend English and don'tneed to resort to lying and twisting other people's words around to make a valid point like you do...regularly(except maybe the lying part...only caught you in the act of that one time...)

Oh really, and when was that?
 
Hmmm what?? A little arrogant for proving absolutely nothing other than a practical understanding of Google, dontcha think?

In SOME states, for SOME charges, with SOME juveniles, yes, this is the case. However, in most states, this does not include corporal crimes...which statutry rape is classified as. So is assault...

And if these kids did actually cross the imaginary line between schoolyard taunting and harrassment or abuse, than they deserve charges.

But as of yet, we have no idea if these charges are deserved or not. Nobody on this forum knows what these kids actually did.

But let's go ahead and arrest them, charge them, and hell we here at CS.com have already convicted them, so we might as well get on with the execution, right?

Alright, fine. I'll go on a deeper search, and I'll provide you with better answers.

You win this time Chris. In this case the crimes the kids committed would not be expunged from their records, however they would be allowed to have their records sealed three years after they served their time. (Not including the 18-year old, he's SOL on that one.)

Expunging a record destroys the record entirely. Juvenile records cannot be expunged in Massachusetts, although several other states do allow some form of expunging. A few states do not allow courts to seal or expunge records at all.

A record only can be "sealed" three years after a person has finished serving his or her sentence for a crime.

Sealing removes the record from the main record file and secures it in a separate file available only to a restricted group of readers. Sealed juvenile records can still be used by judges in later criminal cases against the same person, even after the person becomes an adult.

If the police or a court asks about the record of a person whose record has been sealed, they are told that the person has a "sealed delinquency record over 3 years old." All other people that ask about the record are told that the person has "no record."


Are these sources better, Chris?

Searched on the Massachusetts state site.
Came to this page.
And found the information above.
 
Back
Top