Gregg
Ancient Elder
No, I'm not a mind reader.
Like the rest of you, I appreciate having this site to come to and share knowledge. Rich has done a great service for us, but even he will admit that it isn't free. He is having trouble keeping it alive. He has asked for our help. I have sent what I can, considering I make very little, but it won't be enough to save this site. And, though Ken Harbart might cringe at this (sorry Ken), I agree 100% with what he said in his statement above.
I have never said that Rich was "wrong," or that he was being "unfair." What I have said expresses what I felt on a gut level when I read what Rich wrote. Even a fool can see that, eventually, Rich will either have to close this site, because it is costing him too much too keep it alive on his own, or he will have to ask us to start paying the bill for it. A "mind reader?" No. Rich has been saying this all along, since he opened this new forum format.
What pisses me off is the fact that the vast majority of people don't think on there own. They would rather follow a leader who thinks for them. These people will always band together to jump on those individuals who do not agree with the majority--the "Herd," if you will. They are quick to crucify, slow to ask why. I guess because it makes them look righteous, or something. It also sickens me to see people mindlessly jump onto a bandwagon, without any thought regarding their actions, and then turn critical of those who can, and do think on their own. So, I jump in and start defending the anti-social position so it can get heard. Perhaps it's a Sixties hold-over attitude.
Anyway, I love this site. I would love to see it stay FREE, but it isn't free. Rich pays for it--always has. Now, he says he cannot pay for it any longer. He needs us to pay for it. He has been saying that this day might come ever since he opened this new fangled site board. Some will not like having to pay, some will not mind paying. If someone doesn't want to pay, big deal, let 'em go. People should be able to vote with their feet and not be criticised. If Rich has to, or decides he wants to, charge for this site, then that is something we will all have to live with and come to our own decisions as to whether or not we want, or can, continue being "Members" of this site.
Besides, I just love stirring up a hornets nest.
Like the rest of you, I appreciate having this site to come to and share knowledge. Rich has done a great service for us, but even he will admit that it isn't free. He is having trouble keeping it alive. He has asked for our help. I have sent what I can, considering I make very little, but it won't be enough to save this site. And, though Ken Harbart might cringe at this (sorry Ken), I agree 100% with what he said in his statement above.
I have never said that Rich was "wrong," or that he was being "unfair." What I have said expresses what I felt on a gut level when I read what Rich wrote. Even a fool can see that, eventually, Rich will either have to close this site, because it is costing him too much too keep it alive on his own, or he will have to ask us to start paying the bill for it. A "mind reader?" No. Rich has been saying this all along, since he opened this new forum format.
What pisses me off is the fact that the vast majority of people don't think on there own. They would rather follow a leader who thinks for them. These people will always band together to jump on those individuals who do not agree with the majority--the "Herd," if you will. They are quick to crucify, slow to ask why. I guess because it makes them look righteous, or something. It also sickens me to see people mindlessly jump onto a bandwagon, without any thought regarding their actions, and then turn critical of those who can, and do think on their own. So, I jump in and start defending the anti-social position so it can get heard. Perhaps it's a Sixties hold-over attitude.
Anyway, I love this site. I would love to see it stay FREE, but it isn't free. Rich pays for it--always has. Now, he says he cannot pay for it any longer. He needs us to pay for it. He has been saying that this day might come ever since he opened this new fangled site board. Some will not like having to pay, some will not mind paying. If someone doesn't want to pay, big deal, let 'em go. People should be able to vote with their feet and not be criticised. If Rich has to, or decides he wants to, charge for this site, then that is something we will all have to live with and come to our own decisions as to whether or not we want, or can, continue being "Members" of this site.
Besides, I just love stirring up a hornets nest.