• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

O my gosh I want a ball python!!!!

AndrewH--
I stated that in comparison to cornsnakes and kingsnakes, ball pythons are "picky". I also stated they are more sensitive. Neither of these statements is false. They are, generally and comparatively speaking, true.
Actually, when you look at what the average 'keeper' attempts to feed their Ball Python before really looking at the species, and what it needs; they're not some horrendously poor feeding animal. If they were, why did they gain such a following of hardcore keepers? Why are they rated as one of the best beginner species of snake? That you cannot argue, and try to disprove.

tyflier said:
Now, if you want top compare BPs to something like ETBs or GTPs or something more difficult, your comparative analysis will change, and BPs will suddenly seem very easy to care for.
The simple thing is this. You're obviously ignorant when it comes to this species if you truly believe they're that difficult to care for, and only look simply when standing in the light of Corralus or Morelia species. Ball Pythons are very easy to care for, and are incredibly hardy animals. They can take about anything, and bounce right back, no problem. Their care is very generalized, and requires little to no specialization.

tyflier said:
Unfortunately, this is a cornsnake site, and MOST of the experience and advice offered on this forum is a comparative analysis to cornsnakes. And comparatively speaking, ball pythons are much more sensitive and picky than cornsnakes.
Yet here I am, offering information. I really don't recall this thread being a 'Corn Snake vs. Ball Python' thread.... do you? I remember someone calling them picky, expensive, and touchy with temperatures. It really seems to me like you're the only one trying to compare them to anything, rather than look at them in general and how easy they are to care for in general.

tyflier said:
All of your excuses for AHY they are more picky doesn't alter the fact that they typically are more picky. It just gives them a good reason for being more picky...
If you ever call my information an excuse again; me and you are going to have some problems. Got it?

Like I said, you're trying to compare apples to oranges, when oranges were never in the picture to begin with.
 
It would probably be a good idea for the ball python debaters to cool down a little. Please remain civil!
 
It would probably be a good idea for the ball python debaters to cool down a little. Please remain civil!

I think that the biggest stink in this whole thread has been the attacks on teens and college students. At least that is what I seen the most uproar about. I am actually learning quite a bit from the BP debate.
 
I think that the biggest stink in this whole thread has been the attacks on teens and college students. At least that is what I seen the most uproar about. I am actually learning quite a bit from the BP debate.

I agree. I am still quite angry about that.
 
It's their opinion, pretty much just prove them wrong or shrug it off guys. You know you can take care of your animals and that you have a passion for them (if you didn't... You probably wouldn't be on this site).

I know if no one ever let me have pets growing up I wouldn't be the animal lover I am today.

Besides there are tons of people who don't feel that way, don't let it get to you.
 
Oh, it isn't getting to me. I was just pointing out my observations. I am far from the average college student, and haven't been a teen for a while now.
 
It's their opinion, pretty much just prove them wrong or shrug it off guys. You know you can take care of your animals and that you have a passion for them (if you didn't... You probably wouldn't be on this site).

I know if no one ever let me have pets growing up I wouldn't be the animal lover I am today.

Besides there are tons of people who don't feel that way, don't let it get to you.

I don't care if its their opinion, its completely rude and a terribly mean thing to say. That's like saying its okay for someone to be racist because "thats their opinion". If they are going to have such opinions when there are plenty of teenagers that prove them wrong just on this website alone, then they are not only being rude but they are pretty much WRONG as well. Honestly if they think its better to not sell to teenagers because its a possibility that the teenager may neglect the animal than they may as well not sell to ANYONE, because its equally likely that an adult may neglect the animal as well, no matter if they have a more stable life or not. All the animal neglect stories I have heard of have been about ADULTS neglecting the animals, not teenagers, because if a teenager has a pet then its the parents responsibility to make sure that the teenager is responsibly caring for that pet. If the parent is not willing to take that responsibility, then the teenager shouldn't have any pets. And if the teenager has to rehome the animal because of some change in their life, so what? It doesn't mean it will go to a bad home. Plenty of people rehome animals, teenagers and adults alike.

You take the risk of placing an animal in a neglectful situation ANY time you sell an animal, not just when you sell to teenagers. If its their choice not to sell any animals to anyone under a certain age thats fine, they can do that, but its still completely rude and unnecessary and UNTRUE to say that selling an animal to a teenager is pretty much the same as killing it yourself.
 
I think that the biggest stink in this whole thread has been the attacks on teens and college students. At least that is what I seen the most uproar about. I am actually learning quite a bit from the BP debate.

Wasn't that just one person? (Which doesn't make it a valid statement). Please don't make me have to go back and read this whole thread again...
 
Well, the post that really made me angry was this one:

If you have bred an animal, you are responsible for it in my opinion. When a person on this forum said they were freezing perfectly healthy baby corns because the economy had tanked and they couldn't get "what the snake is worth" for each baby, many, many people were up in arms....

In my opinion, selling to a teenager or the average college age student is no different than chucking that snake in a freezer. In fact, freezing them would be preferable to what many snakes sold to kids have to endure before finally passing away.

You would not believe the stories I hear as a teacher who keeps snakes in their classroom about students reptile and small mammal "disposable" pets. Students have had their parents flush frogs down the toilet... tossed hamsters out into fields...

All because the parents didn't want to deal with the responsibility after the kid was no longer interested.



I'm really happy for you. The sad fact is that most people your age are barely capable of taking care of themselves, let alone an animal with real needs.

My opinion is unpopular amongst people who want to believe that their responsibility as a breeder ends with a sale. I know that, but it doesn't change my thoughts on the matter.

I do agree that there are some cases where parents allow kids to get pets that they aren't willing to take responsibility for if need be, but that still doesn't excuse the bolded sentence. Watch out for irresponsible parents, then. Don't blame the kids. Teenagers should know better, anyways, and if they don't I still blame the parent.
 
I agree... From working at the Snake Shop and from owning ball pythons myself.. I would agree that they are a little bit more work than cornsnakes.. They are not hard to care for animals, but do have a tendency to go off feed sometimes and have a harder time shedding.. Would I recommend them as a beginner snake? Yes, as long as the caretaker is informed and is ready to deal with said issues if they arise. Not all ball pythons go off feed or have shedding issues. But they are more likely to do so than cornsnakes. They are also more likely to have upper respiratory problems from being too cold than cornsnakes as well. Plain and simple, with any reptile, as long as you are well informed and research the animal you are planning to keep as a pet and are prepared to care for it correctly, you shouldn't have much problem in caring for them, and you will know what to do if you do come into problems. I would say ball pythons are one step above cornsnakes as far as care needs, but nothing as hard as compared to some of the other snakes available as pets out there. So as always, be informed and do your research well before purchasing your new pet..
 
Actually, when you look at what the average 'keeper' attempts to feed their Ball Python before really looking at the species, and what it needs; they're not some horrendously poor feeding animal. If they were, why did they gain such a following of hardcore keepers? Why are they rated as one of the best beginner species of snake? That you cannot argue, and try to disprove.
Fact-They are more specific in their requirements AND they are more picky than most North American colubrids.

Fact-Kingsnakes and cornsnakes top the charts when it comes to ease of care and also in popularity as first-time reptile pets.

Fact-Feeding f/t prey is safer, cheaper, and more convenient than live prey in 99% of instances. The fact that BPs are more reluctant than other common pet snakes to get into a consistent f/t feeding pattern makes them "more difficult" in captivity.

F/t is the industry standard for a REASON. Justifying a snake's reluctance to take f/t by saying "it's their preferance" is ludicrous at best. NO snakes get f/t in the wild, therefor NO snake has a preferance for f/t. Yet *most* convert with relative ease in captivity. Ball pythons are more reluctant than other highly recommended first-time-pet snakes at this. This makes them "more difficult".


The simple thing is this. You're obviously ignorant when it comes to this species if you truly believe they're that difficult to care for, and only look simply when standing in the light of Corralus or Morelia species. Ball Pythons are very easy to care for, and are incredibly hardy animals. They can take about anything, and bounce right back, no problem. Their care is very generalized, and requires little to no specialization.
I'm not one to run off at the mouth without having some knowledge, experience, and information with which to back my position. Nobody ever said ball pythons were particularly difficult to care for. I, and others, said they are MORE DIFFICULT THAN CORNSNAKES. This is an indisputable fact, no matter how you try to slice it.

Anyone can care for a BP properly, even as a first-time owner, with some effort. It is a fact that this effort is more "intense" than that required for proper corn and kingsnake care in general.

Is it difficult to properly care for a ball python? No. But ONLY if you understand a few basic things about ball pythons in specific. These basics include their reluctance to feed f/t readily, their natural tendency to go "off feed" at specific times for extended periods, and that their humidity and temperature ranges are more specific than other commonly kept introductory pet snakes.


Yet here I am, offering information. I really don't recall this thread being a 'Corn Snake vs. Ball Python' thread.... do you? I remember someone calling them picky, expensive, and touchy with temperatures. It really seems to me like you're the only one trying to compare them to anything, rather than look at them in general and how easy they are to care for in general.
I recall this thread being started by a person that owns a cornsnake, on a cornsnake website, where the majority of the members are cornsnake owners. Anytime someone on this forum posts "I'm gonna get a ball python!!!!!11", the general consensus is to inform those individuals that comparatively speaking, they are more difficult than corns and kings.

Not only that, in my first post in this thread, I made certain to specifically speak in comparative terms, as I have done with every post I've made.

Yet here you are...addressing me as though I've no idea what I am talking about, trying to prove my comparative arguments as false when they are, in fact, quite true. And relevant.

You specifically addressed me, trying to prove my "ignorance". I made a very distinct comparative analysis in the post which you addressed. Don't get mad at me because you can't keep track of your arguments...


If you ever call my information an excuse again; me and you are going to have some problems. Got it?
Is that a threat? My name's Chris Morrison. I live in Bishop, California. Stop by anytime. Excuses are like butts. Everyone has one, and they all stink. Yours are no different.

Like I said, you're trying to compare apples to oranges, when oranges were never in the picture to begin with.
I'm comparing recommended first-time-pet snakes, as I have since my first post, on a website dedicated to oranges. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing.
 
I don't care if its their opinion, its completely rude and a terribly mean thing to say. That's like saying its okay for someone to be racist because "thats their opinion". QUOTE]

I wasn't agreeing with their opinion at all, and I don't think it's 'okay'.
All I'm saying is it's their ignorant opinion so just blow it off, you have to deal with these kind of people everyday. If they're judging you by age, race, gender, etc.

What I ment by "thats their opinion" was more of...
Thats their opinion, let them think that way... Because there are so many people who don't feel that way. They're ignorant yes, and I don't agree with them.

Believe me, if you read the rest of that post... I wasn't agreeing with them at all. I wouldn't be who I am if I didn't own pets when I was younger.
 
Fact-They are more specific in their requirements AND they are more picky than most North American colubrids.

Fact-Kingsnakes and cornsnakes top the charts when it comes to ease of care and also in popularity as first-time reptile pets.

Fact-Feeding f/t prey is safer, cheaper, and more convenient than live prey in 99% of instances. The fact that BPs are more reluctant than other common pet snakes to get into a consistent f/t feeding pattern makes them "more difficult" in captivity.

F/t is the industry standard for a REASON. Justifying a snake's reluctance to take f/t by saying "it's their preferance" is ludicrous at best. NO snakes get f/t in the wild, therefor NO snake has a preferance for f/t. Yet *most* convert with relative ease in captivity. Ball pythons are more reluctant than other highly recommended first-time-pet snakes at this. This makes them "more difficult".
Facts, eh? Prove them as fact. Show me any part of literature, any and all documentation; anything that proves so.

What you define as 'picky' is more a life cycle for these animals. When, and I repeat when they do go off feed, it is for reason. Their body doesn't need at the time. does it mean they are being picky, simply due to the fact that they won't feed that specific time, due to the fact that 'you' would like them to? If they're not losing body weight, and are showing signs they simply don't need any sustenance during that particular time... where's the pickiness? Really....

So by your logic, when colubrids go off feed during their cycle for reproduction, or another environmental factor in their life, they're being 'picky'. By your 'standard', around 99% of all species in the industry, if not 100%, are completely picky. Hmmm.

Prove to me that F/T is safer. I don't care what you use, there is a risk to everything. There's a risk to the prey that is thawed, sitting too long and building bacteria, which could in turn harm your animals. There is risk of rodent's not being completely thawed, even if you use the 'pinch' method. If you're not pulling an over kill, and giving your animal a prey item that is too large... there is little to no risk.

Show me the benefits outside of a possible scar that may occur with f/t. Any nutritional benefits, aid in digestion, etc etc? Show me how they are more convenient.

I think you simply refuse to accept the fact that they're built differently for different reason. Ball Pythons are specifically built to handle mammalian prey. This is why they have heat pits. If you can't handle feeding off live, don't buy a Ball. Live isn't exactly a hard prey to come by, and most stores have been carrying live prey for how long? 30 years? 40? Frozen prey is just now coming onto the scene, and it hasn't gained too much momentum, comparative to what you believe.

Look at how ever many breeders... actual breeders with a collection larger than 30 animals; and tell me exactly how many feed f/t? If convenience is thawing out rodents for 4 hours, going tub to tub, and dangling them due to risk on intestinal impaction from bedding sticking to wet rodents if you lay them down, when I can simply drop a live rat in the snake's cage, and let them do what they're built for.... count me out. I'll stick to live.

I'm not one to run off at the mouth without having some knowledge, experience, and information with which to back my position. Nobody ever said ball pythons were particularly difficult to care for. I, and others, said they are MORE DIFFICULT THAN CORNSNAKES. This is an indisputable fact, no matter how you try to slice it.
Actually, your original posts argued the fact that they were more difficult snakes in general, and how they go off feed. The original argument was that they were
-a expensive
-b picky eaters
-c need spot on temps

Perhaps you should go back and re-read? Corn snakes came onto the scene with your posts. As I've said, this isn't a Corn snake vs. Ball Python thread. It never was.

Anyone can care for a BP properly, even as a first-time owner, with some effort. It is a fact that this effort is more "intense" than that required for proper corn and kingsnake care in general.
If you really call buying a live rat, and actually having to use a heat pad more 'intense', you should really re-think your logic here.

Is it difficult to properly care for a ball python? No. But ONLY if you understand a few basic things about ball pythons in specific. These basics include their reluctance to feed f/t readily, their natural tendency to go "off feed" at specific times for extended periods, and that their humidity and temperature ranges are more specific than other commonly kept introductory pet snakes.
You still refuse to accept the fact that, in order to care for any species, you need a basic knowledge of that species. I really don't care if it's a Kingsnake, a Garter, a Burmese Python, etc. Add to that the insult that you're looking at, due to the fact that they do not burmate like colubrids, it's automatically blacklisted as being picky, rather than being a natural part of their life.


I recall this thread being started by a person that owns a cornsnake, on a cornsnake website, where the majority of the members are cornsnake owners. Anytime someone on this forum posts "I'm gonna get a ball python!!!!!11", the general consensus is to inform those individuals that comparatively speaking, they are more difficult than corns and kings.
And if they own a Corn Snake, they really don't need a lecture about how different they are. They need tips on actual care, husbandry, and medical aspects to better prepare them. You're not here to dissuade them from buying one, and go into buying another Corn. The job here is education. To state that they are, again-
-a expensive
-b picky eaters
-c need spot on temps
Is not helping, nor aid. It's lecturing when on a Corn board, where do any of the Corn Snake breeders stand to give much more than basic information on the species? Point?

Not only that, in my first post in this thread, I made certain to specifically speak in comparative terms, as I have done with every post I've made.

Yet here you are...addressing me as though I've no idea what I am talking about, trying to prove my comparative arguments as false when they are, in fact, quite true. And relevant.

You specifically addressed me, trying to prove my "ignorance". I made a very distinct comparative analysis in the post which you addressed. Don't get mad at me because you can't keep track of your arguments...
And why? Because you had specifically addressed me in the same fashion. Obviously you're not a fan of criticism, and it show's. If you can't argue your point without taking shots, such as calling information nothing more than excuses; you really don't have a leg to stand on.

I want to see these facts as actual facts. As a breeder myself, am I supposed to believe you simply because you say? Or am I to look at actual facts from working first hand with well over what the normal 'keeper' holds in their collection, regarding this species? I think that seems pretty obvious. If I were blowing smoke out of my butt, how have I been so successful in what I do in regards to both husbandry, and reproduction, with this species this long?

Hmm. It seems to me, you're the one all butt hurt over the fact that you jumped in here to debate, yet you have absolutely nothing to really prove your points.


Is that a threat? My name's Chris Morrison. I live in Bishop, California. Stop by anytime. Excuses are like butts. Everyone has one, and they all stink. Yours are no different.
I'll have to look you up sometime ;)

To call information another breeder puts forth, an excuse. It's ignorance. It's a cheap shot trying to win an argument. If it could be turned any which way, your information could be looked at as an excuse in order to promote another species. That would be the more logical view.

I'm comparing recommended first-time-pet snakes, as I have since my first post, on a website dedicated to oranges. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing.
I bet it is, yet if it were, you would have understood where the argument first stemmed. Correct? Who would be better to talk Ball Pythons? A Corn Snake breeder or a Ball Python breeder? The original poster did not ask for a comparison. There's no need for one. They stated they want a Ball Python.

I wonder how delicious apples are. I better ask an Orange Grove.

*This is in no way an insult to the Corn Snake keepers here. Just a simple debate.
 
Facts, eh? Prove them as fact. Show me any part of literature, any and all documentation; anything that proves so.

What you define as 'picky' is more a life cycle for these animals. .
Actually I can show you a number of sites with hundreds of posts from people worrying about their non feeder Bp....
You must of seen these as well so why are you arguing the opposite....
It's a fact that Bp can go off feed for months and people worry about them....
 
Actually I can show you a number of sites with hundreds of posts from people worrying about their non feeder Bp....
You must of seen these as well so why are you arguing the opposite....
It's a fact that Bp can go off feed for months and people worry about them....
And these 'non-feeders' are normally females around the rough 900-1,100 gram mark that go off feed. It happens a large majority of females. It's more than likely related to development and their reproduction system. Tell me how that animal going off of feed relates to that animal being a picky individual/eater? I'd really like to know.

If the animal goes off of feed for any particular reason, and isn't losing body weight, and shows no adverse effects; why do they have to stick to the schedule we want them on? They're not toy's that need to do everything we want them to.

The good majority of the other posts with those 'hundreds' are due to individuals buying imported ch animals. They normally come from pet stores. When did I ever debate about wild animals going off feed after coming into captivity? Hmm... If you look at about any other species, wild caught animals have bad tendencies to go off of feed. Their captive hatched animals are normally passed off as captive born and bred. The majority of people that 'worry' are newbies, and individuals new to keeping the species. How many experienced individuals panic if it ever does happen?
 
And these 'non-feeders' are normally females around the rough 900-1,100 gram mark that go off feed. It happens a large majority of females. It's more than likely related to development and their reproduction system. Tell me how that animal going off of feed relates to that animal being a picky individual/eater? I'd really like to know.

If the animal goes off of feed for any particular reason, and isn't losing body weight, and shows no adverse effects; why do they have to stick to the schedule we want them on? They're not toy's that need to do everything we want them to.

The good majority of the other posts with those 'hundreds' are due to individuals buying imported ch animals. They normally come from pet stores. When did I ever debate about wild animals going off feed after coming into captivity? Hmm... If you look at about any other species, wild caught animals have bad tendencies to go off of feed. Their captive hatched animals are normally passed off as captive born and bred. The majority of people that 'worry' are newbies, and individuals new to keeping the species. How many experienced individuals panic if it ever does happen?
So the bottom line, by your own admission, is they can go off feeding...
No spin on it now Andrew.... Read your post and you will admit that going off food is a Bp norm.....
 
Hey Nitelion94,

See what you started by wishing what you wanted. Now you have Cornsnakes and Kingsnakes in the fight also. You also got all the teenagers and college kids mad :argue: at the old people here. I am going to :sidestep: and run out of here before one of you teenagers or college kids catch and set me on fire :flames:.

Love the Fatman :santa:
 
Hey Nitelion94,

See what you started by wishing what you wanted. Now you have Cornsnakes and Kingsnakes in the fight also. You also got all the teenagers and college kids mad :argue: at the old people here. I am going to :sidestep: and run out of here before one of you teenagers or college kids catch and set me on fire :flames:.

Love the Fatman :santa:
Bawhahahaha.... Love it dude.... Classic.
 
Again... why can't we just get along and have nice conversations about snakes? People love corns and people love Bp's, that's all that matters :D
 
Again... why can't we just get along and have nice conversations about snakes? People love corns and people love Bp's, that's all that matters :D
Loving them is the problem here.... LOL
We are debating the husbandry and what is likely to be expected when you own one..... Nothing to do with arguing and fighting or getting along for that matter...:)
 
Back
Top