Hypancistrus
New member
I am inspired to post this thread here after a debate emerged at the fish forum that I moderate for regarding the risk of getting "bird keepers lung" from keeping pet birds in your house.
I am wondering what everyone here's opinions are of risk management and pet keeping-- where do you draw the line?
I will briefly summarize my stance on the issue. I have moderately bad asthma. I am allergic to most things with fur and probably the feathered things as well, though, to my knowlege, I've never been tested for that. I am under the care of an allergist I like, after having fired one that I did not like (he wanted me to be bubble girl) In spite of this, I live with a dog, a cat, a bird, countless furries, and of course, my herps. I compensate for this by medicating myself. It's not perfect, and I am sure I could breathe better if I gave up my pets and lived the bubble girl life... but then there wouldn't be much of a point to living, would there?
I enjoy my pets. They give me a reason to be happy when I come home each night. They help me to forget the fact that my students can't multiple 10 x 3 without a calculator. They get me through my day... they are my companions and make my life brighter than it could ever be without them.
So I could give my animals up and reduce the risk of contracting lung cancer or some other lung disease. Then again, I do live in Baltimore, where the air quality is crap (literally) and it's probably going to kill me anyway.
But I could give up my pets and be that much safer, that much "healthier" physically speaking....
And I could still be killed in a car crash on my way to school.
Health is, after all, merely the slowest possible way of dying.
I would love to hear other people's thoughts on the risk versus reward of pet keeping... I am pretty sure that people in here will understand my line of thinking better than other people might.
I am wondering what everyone here's opinions are of risk management and pet keeping-- where do you draw the line?
I will briefly summarize my stance on the issue. I have moderately bad asthma. I am allergic to most things with fur and probably the feathered things as well, though, to my knowlege, I've never been tested for that. I am under the care of an allergist I like, after having fired one that I did not like (he wanted me to be bubble girl) In spite of this, I live with a dog, a cat, a bird, countless furries, and of course, my herps. I compensate for this by medicating myself. It's not perfect, and I am sure I could breathe better if I gave up my pets and lived the bubble girl life... but then there wouldn't be much of a point to living, would there?
I enjoy my pets. They give me a reason to be happy when I come home each night. They help me to forget the fact that my students can't multiple 10 x 3 without a calculator. They get me through my day... they are my companions and make my life brighter than it could ever be without them.
So I could give my animals up and reduce the risk of contracting lung cancer or some other lung disease. Then again, I do live in Baltimore, where the air quality is crap (literally) and it's probably going to kill me anyway.
But I could give up my pets and be that much safer, that much "healthier" physically speaking....
And I could still be killed in a car crash on my way to school.
Health is, after all, merely the slowest possible way of dying.
I would love to hear other people's thoughts on the risk versus reward of pet keeping... I am pretty sure that people in here will understand my line of thinking better than other people might.