There seems to be something going on with the pattern of this Tessera neonate but the results you posted do not make sense to me.
Lets take this as a Striped (Tessera) for the Moment and you hatched a Motley as well in the same clutch.
I'll display my thoughts and thinking path based on recessive genetics and the dominance from Motley over Striped.
Logically it must be that one parent animal is at least het Striped and at least the other one is carrying both, het Motley het Striped - what changes the phenotype in this animal as its alleic to eatch other. Like this you can hatch both in Phenotype, Stripeds & Motleys.
Therefore Mum & Dad MUST both carry pattern gene(s) for providing a Striped and a Motley.
You write she's in phenotype a normal, so she could "only" carry maximum one pattern gene - hetero Motley or hetero Striped. Otherwise it would be expressed. Regarding that you hatched a Striped (Tessera) she is het Striped. And male carries both - As one animal of the parental generation needs to carry both for such a result.
But would Tessera Motley X Striped look like normal Tessera? Only if this would be no big change in phenotype it would explain that the male is carrying both.
What was your last breeding with this female Normal het Amel?
If both carry Striped & she was bred to a Mot last year that would be an hypothetical explanation of the results. Never heard of a double sired clutch, but yeah i'm not too experienced in this :sidestep:
Or it is no Tessera Striped.
My final opinion? Strange result. Keep & testbreed. LOL
(Hope you could follow my english... :dgrin
