• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

That will never happen in America

Actually, I'd like to change that. Ted's policy would more likely be shoot every violent criminal, thief, and other low life punk that are leeches on modern society. Shoot every person that wants to intrude on any of his - or a fellow humans- personal rights and liberties. ..and then shoot some animals to eat. Stupid people are OK as long as the "leave me the hell alone."
Click to expand...
I agree...My boyfriend thinks we should be allowed to carry a handgun and if we see someone raping, stealing from, or hurting anyone else, we should be allowed to pop them with NO consiquences...
 
KJUN said:
Oh, heck. Nuge/Mad Max. The character. Not the actor. You know us gun "nuts" would vote for that...even if we KNOW one is a fictional character. :)
Click to expand...

And you can name a politician that really isn't a piece of fiction?

KJUN said:
If the election is fair and unemployment is over 10%, I think Amerika might vote in the cookie monster if he was running against Obama.
Click to expand...

Give Obama those few more years in office and see if we don't have us a good ol' fashion lynchin'!
 
COerriccaRN said:
*Off Topic* I heard that Obama beleive that is a Child isn't a "human" until they can reason. Which is at two years old...and wants to *eventually* pass a law where you can "do away" with a "handicapped" child under two years old. Not sure how TRUE the second part is, just heard it from someone. But Obama DOES agree with the first part. Scary, huh?
Click to expand...
He's not an android, and I'm sure you'd have to ask him his view on toddler destruction before you make an assumption like that.

COerriccaRN said:
I agree...My boyfriend thinks we should be allowed to carry a handgun and if we see someone raping, stealing from, or hurting anyone else, we should be allowed to pop them with NO consiquences...
Click to expand...
Ya, that wouldn't gunk up the judicial system?. "Sir he ran off with my IPhone, what choice did I have?". People have a right to keep protection, but to shoot people over every alleged crime is fairly extreme, IMO. There is such thing as a concealed weapons permit, and those who have no criminal history can pursue one. People who are that eager to deal death shouldn't have those rights, and already there's a thread on police corruption; that would just lead to Anarchy.
 
Ya, that wouldn't gunk up the judicial system?. "Sir he ran off with my IPhone, what choice did I have?". People have a right to keep protection, but to shoot people over every alleged crime is fairly extreme, IMO. There is such thing as a concealed weapons permit, and those who have no criminal history can pursue one. People who are that eager to deal death shouldn't have those rights, and already there's a thread on police corruption; that would just lead to Anarchy.
Click to expand...

Um...most of that was pretty much a joke.
 
Cornsnake124 said:
Michael and nova, why can we not say ANYTHING bad about you, but its "spot on" when you guys insult us? Hmm... what is that word i'm looking for..... it begins with hipoc..... hmmm....
Click to expand...

I didn't insult anyone but KJUN, and I showed exactly why I feel the way I do, that is, that KJUN was demanding evidence for a point contrary to his own, but has repeatedly refused to show evidence when he disagrees with points that I've made. Feel free to show examples of my hypocrisy. I will take responsibility for them.
 
He's not an android, and I'm sure you'd have to ask him his view on toddler destruction before you make an assumption like that.
Click to expand...

Didn't say he was...but he does beleive the first part, which is CRAZY.
 
If it's just hear say especially volatile hear say, let’s keep it to ourselves unless you can put some kind or validity or documentation to it.
 
COerriccaRN said:
Heres on Article on it

And another


And another, just for good measure
Click to expand...

I like those articles, especially that first one that tries to construe the word 'socialize' as some kind of government indoctrination.

Definition of the verb 'socialize':
VERB:
tr.

1. To place under government or group ownership or control.
2. To make fit for companionship with others; make sociable.
3. To convert or adapt to the needs of society.

VERB:
intr.

To take part in social activities.

Notice how none of those definitions include the concept of indoctrination, and, in fact, out of the ones that can be applied to a single person, and not property, most relate to socializing with other people.

Anyway, children are not people according to the government of the United States as it is. They cannot vote. They cannot own property. They are subject to the authority of their parents. Children do not have the rights that adults do.

Those articles have heavy, heavy bias, and they also quote mine a book for their own ends. I also enjoy the last quote of the first article:

"Once you turn against God, conscience isn’t a factor."

Apparently if you aren't a Christian, you're a sociopathic monster.
 
Nova_C said:
I didn't insult anyone but KJUN, and I showed exactly why I feel the way I do, that is, that KJUN was demanding evidence for a point contrary to his own, but has repeatedly refused to show evidence when he disagrees with points that I've made. Feel free to show examples of my hypocrisy. I will take responsibility for them.
Click to expand...

I already answered that a long time ago...if you wouldn't ignore things you don't like, you'd understand. That, and I don't respect peopel that hide behind a keyboard. Even Michael and Ricky don't do that. There ARE some things I like about them.
 
Okay, here's your post in response to mine:

KJUN said:
I probably did cross the line. I can only take being called so many things before I blow up in return. Ricky/Micheal/Odin - whatever they pretend to be today - just pushes enough to get a response like that out of me. Like I said - best TROLL ever. Kudos. They win.

I often ignore you, Nova, because you are even more blatant about ignoring anything you disagree with than Ricky/Micheal. You aren't really even on my radar, so why should I worry? Plus, I don't really care what you think since you aren't one of the ones that voted us into this mess (assuming you are really a Canadian). Your thoughts on the matter don't matter to me. Hmmm, I'm the one who is a hypocrite while YOU are the one who uses such harsh terms to prove a point. I've always considered profanity the last resort of a weak mind. Search for that statement - I've likely said it before. I understand that when both parties throw crap, EVERYONE loses because we are all covered in crap. Sure, I know that. But I just got tired of all the Micheal/Ricky/Odin crap in the room and decided I'd throw crap back. A little crap is getting a LOT of crap in return. I've got bigger hands maybe. ;) (ADDED - this is not meant as an attack or an insult, "Nova." It's an explanation that I really don't see the point in arguing politics with a Canadian since we aren't even in the same voting system Please don't take it as a further attack - it's just a statement of why I really don't care to devote time to a rather heated disagreement with you. Yes, you cite Wikicrapia and say things like you won't read articles from certain real news channels, but the reason I tend to ignore you is because there is no potential for gain. Obviously, I like Canadians in general, but arguing politics with ANY of them is silly for me. I might have a fun discussion, but I don't think either of us have what you'd call FUN, do you?)

...and the funniest thing ever stated is where Micheal/Ricky/Odin/whoever it was accused Wade of being in my corner completely. Did that one make you choke, Wade? It just made me smile.

To explain part of my post, those that didn't get it need to realize how many things Ricky/Michael/Odin have claimed to be experts at...and then compare that to how many times they've whined about being unable to perform any job. It is sickening. One of them even said they COULD work, buit stay on disability checks so they can drive their mom around. How many of us that do work wish we didn't have to so we could help out parents? THEN, they come out and tell us how we know nothing next to them. It's just gotten so darn repetitive, that I've blown a fuse.

I apologize to the third parties reading my comments who may have been upset. I'm sorry, but I won't edit it so people can't claim I'm trying to hide. I offer NO apologies to Ricky/Micheal?Odin since they are the one that started the name calling many, many times whenever they were refuted. If they start it, I don't feel wrong for not continuing to ignore it.
Click to expand...

Okay, so you tell me if I'm understanding you wrong:

You believe I ignore things I disagree with. My thoughts don't matter to you because I'm not American. You question my integrity with doubts that I really am Canadian. You believe I have a weak mind because I use profanity.

Does that sum up your post?
 
KJUN said:
I often ignore you, Nova, because you are even more blatant about ignoring anything you disagree with than Ricky/Micheal
Click to expand...
Oh, now I love you. We are less blatant about ignoring anything we disagree with than Nova, how sweet :puke01:.

KJUN said:
I've always considered profanity the last resort of a weak mind.
Click to expand...
I'm sure! :puke01:

KJUN said:
...and the funniest thing ever stated is where Micheal/Ricky/Odin/whoever it was accused Wade of being in my corner completely. Did that one make you choke, Wade? It just made me smile.
Click to expand...
Puckering... wetting lips... :puke01:

KJUN said:
One of them even said they COULD work, buit stay on disability checks so they can drive their mom around. How many of us that do work wish we didn't have to so we could help out parents?
Click to expand...
I would like the exact post in which you are mutilating, then I'll throw in a puke emotican

KJUN said:
THEN, they come out and tell us how we know nothing next to them. It's just gotten so darn repetitive, that I've blown a fuse.
Click to expand...
KJUN said:
I've always considered profanity the last resort of a weak mind.
Click to expand...
Blown a fuse over a forum post? Weak Mind? Toe nail clippings in my head cheese.... Oh man:puke01::puke01::puke01::puke01::puke01::puke01::puke01:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top