• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

The Crypto Truth

Kokopelli

Resident Boa Fanatic
Ever since that unfortunate passing of one of my Boas, and the test results showing that she passed from Crypto, I did my fair share of looking into scientific documentation and speaking with a Biologist in order to understand.

The truth is... that there's ALLOT yet to learn before we'll have the truth... I have not come across any study that seriously tests how common is Crypto in the wild… it is quite possible that it is very common… and once in a great while, like Salmonella, takes its’ toll.

An estimate was given that about 50-60% of the Leopard gecko population in captivity carries this parasite. The implications are quite significant if the same can be said about snakes.
No definitive answers exist in regards to which strains of Crypto cause the disease to erupt either… Can the C.Parvum from rodents cause death to reptiles? There’s no conclusive answer here.
I do know that killing Cryptosporidium is impossible by normal means- the substances/conditions required to neutralize occysts are too powerful for a snake to live through.
So the solution seems to be ‘divide and conquer’… euthanize any infected animal… which seems reasonable, only that we have no decent way of testing for Crypto…
Fecal testing can show false positive results by showing C.Parvum which is believed to not cause health issues to Reptiles. The test itself is inaccurate and there’s a chance that the snake will not shed occysts while defecating, but still be a carrier.

I held back 3 Crypto Positive animals on which I am testing a method of treatment… the occyst count in the stool actually grew in the last test… which either means that the treatment is ineffective, or that it does exactly what it’s supposed to do… since the substance is supposed to be able to attract occysts from the digestive tract and pass along with them in the stool…
Amusingly enough, the appetite of these carriers is if anything, increased during this time, and they are growing strong. They are under strict quarantine measures naturally… but looking at them seriously makes me wonder how many snakes are out there that are carriers but asymptomatic… is it possible for the snake’s immune system to eventually rid itself of the threat? Or at the very least subdue it to a degree which it has no ill effect?

I am beginning to question what we think we know about this parasite- I’m of the opinion that it’s entirely possible that it is far more common than we believe… and if so, especially considering the rather less than perfect means we have of properly diagnosing the threat… shouldn’t we change our view of how we perceive these ailments?
Human beings too have all sorts of parasites, viruses and so forth that can end up being triggered- eradicating them from our system is not always an option… but we can definitely live with them.

I think that with captive breeding, we can’t kid ourselves to isolate these ailments… and new ones will probably pop up along the way.
I euthanized the majority of my Crypto positive animals… even though none of them showed any symptom(aside from being positive in a fecal test).
I have my “clean” group held separately of course… but I don’t know how certain can anyone be… even had I sent biopsies of every single snake(which I won’t be doing- the inherent risk of anesthetics and stress is too much), the results wouldn’t be fool-proof.
 
So much research needs to be done!

Maybe some master's or doctoral student should do their thesis on this!

I am reminded of a story told to me by a biologist at a nature center many years ago. He said that they had 5 obsoleta rats in a big cage for something like 10 or 12 years. They had always lived together with no exposure to any outside reptiles, and had always been healthy. Then one came down with crypto symptoms and tested positive. I believe 1 other in the cage tested positive with no symptoms. The others tested negative several times.

Several possibilities came to mind, such as: Either the positive or negative results were wrong. The positive animals must have had it for the whole 10 or 12 years in captivity without showing symptoms. Some positive carrier somehow got into the cage without notice at some point - and contaminated a couple of snakes, but not the others. It must not be as contagious as thought, if the negative animals were truly negative.

This is purely anecdotal and not scientifically valid, since it was a long time ago and I can't even remember the exact details. But it does give you something to think about.
 
Back
Top