Tula_Montage
It's Jager time!
Toyah, I pm'd you, I was not talking about you.
Thats being a little obvious... If you have a problem with the way I write the WIR perhaps you should talk to me about it.
Toyah, I pm'd you, I was not talking about you.
Thats being a little obvious... If you have a problem with the way I write the WIR perhaps you should talk to me about it.
This is a forum for hobbiest's with some great professionals in the mix. I don't think being a professional photographer would be a requirement, obviously you do, and that is your perogative.
You said a mouthful there!...this is when the fun disapears when people do thankless jobs.
You said a mouthful there!![]()
Toyah, I am truly sorry. My intention was not to see your WIR get sidetracked. But I must say this.
Elle I can only speak for myself. But the one time you picked a picture of mine you had to add that you edited it because of the photo quality. Not that you should be required to care one way or the other how that made me feel but it did hurt a little. I have a new camera that is a little better since then. It's just not everybody can afford a lot of photography equipment or is as dedicated to photography as you are. But that doesn't mean we are not enthusiastic about our new snakes or feel a desire to share our pictures. I know I have personally been taking fewer pictures of my snakes and posting less pictures because every time I post a thread in photo gallery there are only a few replies, but with some other members it quickly goes to 2 pages. And with the political crap going on this forum I know there are people who probably can't stand me just because of my views. It does make me feel like why do I even bother. I'm not saying this backstabbing you. I am bitching but I am directly telling you my feelings.
Elle, if you don't want to do the WIR ... then quit, and someone else can do it instead. Life's too short to be doing things you don't want to do.
You said a mouthful there!![]()
I backed out for two reasons Elle because I chose to not be associated with people who don't keep their end of the bargain and because I was having surgery. My needs would not be met by me doing WIR. I gave you your opinion now give me mine, we just have different ideas as simple as that.Perhaps yeah.. which is why I am no longer enthusiastic about the WIR.
Perhaps Susan should go back to writing it to ensure her needs are being met RE the WIR.
Personally, I think that WIR photos SHOULD have standards. I'm not saying that I want to see all photos that are masterpieces, but I do want to see clarity in the shot, a certain amount of color balance, and some thought in the composition.
The only bias I've seen in the WIR is completely appropriate - bias towards good photography. I also think that the thread picks have been pretty good. The threads I see are usually unique, high-volume, or otherwise enlightening. Since the WIR is a member-sanctioned thing, the writer may choose the content (as I see it, anyways).
Remember, everyone here posted photos BEFORE there was a WIR, so not being mentioned in it should not be a reason to stop. Contact the writer via PM to discuss any bias, or choose not to read it. :shrugs:
Personally, I like the WIR having different authors because of the different slant to each edition. The same as having 3 moderators on this site. Different personalities shine through. Even when I'm participating in the more controversial threads, I like the snapshots of our different takes on life. That such a diverse group can ever agree at all is amazing, all that really connects us is that we found this site!
As far as whether a WIR is photo-heavy, includes birthdays, new aquisitions, new morphs or whatever, I'd never critisise someone giving up their own time for the benefit of the site, unless they only posted about their own snakes!
Establishing standards is not the answer, please remember that people who do the WIR are taking time out of their busy lives to comb through a butt-load of threads and photos. I completely agree with your statement that if you don't like it, don't read it. Period.
I think you misunderstood me a tiny bit, Tonya. When I read it again, I realized it might not have been worded the best way. When I said that photo picks should have certain standards, I do not mean a written list voted on by members or ANYTHING of the sort. What I meant is that each WIR author has certain things that they believe warrant a photos place in the WIR, and certain things which make photos not fitting for the position.
For instance, at least one of the WIR writers likes to pick photos because of their artistic quality. Another likes to include at least one funny and/or cute photo every week. These are their own individual set of standards, which lends some great variety to the WIR.